On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:58:05 -0700, gary.stewarts.vagina@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> While we're at it.
>>
>> Please explain how calling people Criminals because he disagress with them
>> is Linux advcocacy.
>
> Godd question? Why do you call Roy a criminal for using or stealing
> graphics when you have no proof at all.
Well Duh!g, considering I had the artists statement that Roy was infringing
his copyright, i'd call that proof.
> You made all kinds of claims against Roy but you don't seem to have
> any evidence to confirm said claims.
You mean, besides the actual artist? You mean besides the BBC's own terms
of service (when he stole images and trademarks from the BBC)?
Yeah, that's "no proof at all".
>> Please explain how posting year old articles as if they're new and relevant
>> is Linux advocacy.
>
> Why are you here?
> This is a Linux group not a Windows group.
Ahh, nice fake around Duh!g. If you can't question the argument, question
the motive.
>> Please explain how pumping his own articles and blog for advertising money
>> is Linux advocacy.
>
> Who cares?
> Are you jealous because you ddidn't think of it first.
> Roy does a great service to Linux and deserves to make a little money
> for his efforts. I doubt his income from hits is even enough to pay
> for the electric bill.
Ah, so committing copyright infringement, plagerism, lying, and deceiving
deserves payment, according to you, Duh!g. nice.
>> Please explain how flooding a newsgroup with bullshit is Linux advocacy.
>
> You can start explaining that one yourself because that is what you do
> fuddy.
Right, I "flood" the newsgroup. Nice lie there Duh!g.
|
|
