On Nov 3, 3:33 pm, Erik Funkenbusch <e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:19:05 -0000, Tim Smith wrote:
> > On 2007-11-03, bob <b...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Has this thought ever occurred to you? It doesn't seem to have. This is
> >> a Linux advocacy group and that's what belongs here. That's what Roy
> >> posts. I for one, appreciate them. If you don't like them , don't read
> >> them.
>
> > Please explain how lying about Windows is Linux advocacy.
>
> > Please explain how lying about Apple is Linux advocacy.
>
> > Please explain how lying about Linux is Linux advocacy.
>
> > Please explain how posting out-of-context quotes with subject lines that
> > claim things at odds with the cited article is Linux advocacy.
>
> > Please explain how posting as fact rumours which he has no evidence to
> > support is Linux advocacy.
>
> While we're at it.
>
> Please explain how calling people Criminals because he disagress with them
> is Linux advcocacy.
Godd question? Why do you call Roy a criminal for using or stealing
graphics when you have no proof at all.
You made all kinds of claims against Roy but you don't seem to have
any evidence to confirm said claims.
> Please explain how posting year old articles as if they're new and relevant
> is Linux advocacy.
Why are you here?
This is a Linux group not a Windows group.
> Please explain how pumping his own articles and blog for advertising money
> is Linux advocacy.
Who cares?
Are you jealous because you ddidn't think of it first.
Roy does a great service to Linux and deserves to make a little money
for his efforts. I doubt his income from hits is even enough to pay
for the electric bill.
> Please explain how flooding a newsgroup with bullshit is Linux advocacy.
You can start explaining that one yourself because that is what you do
fuddy.
You can start here
You are a habitual liar. For example when you said there were dozens
of root exploits against a certain Linux distro. Or when you've stated
that the Morris worm was spread by email even after it had been
clearly pointed out to you that it wasn't. That's just 2 off the top
of my head. There are many more I'm sure.
Hence I have no trust in anything you write. Your pathetic attempts to
discredit Roy only make you appear a fool as well as a liar.
And they do.
|
|
