In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Tim Smith
<reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:41:01 -0500
<reply_in_group-52546F.10410131102007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> In article <2432574.1AQiuV4eB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> mention this in my previous message) is that I often
>> grab groups of postings rather than assess them on a
>> one-by-one basis. It's risky, but the issue you
>> raise was not deliberate nonetheless.
>
> So you go for quantity over quality. Is that also
> why you don't proofread? To get the posts out faster?
>
> Maybe you should consider posting a few *quality* posts
> a week, instead of trying to spam as much as you can.
Maybe, but then I have a question for you: who determines
what is a quality post?
[a] Roy Schestowitz?
[b] An impartial group of neutral observers? (Good luck
finding one, at this point.)
[c] A self-selected group of COLA lurkers?
[d] Denizens of alt.flame, alt.os.windows, alt.24hrsupport,
or alt.2600, to which COLA messages are occasionally
cross-posted?
[e] Microsoft?
:-)
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows. Because it's not a question of if.
It's a question of when.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
