Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> .NET to LINUX conversion
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| The initial results are showing that our site is running about 60% faster
>| now. Here is a comparison chart of three main pages of our site and the size
>| before and after. Overall, it's a 25% savings site-wide on performance. If
>| you take into account that we are now showing more pictures on
>| the "City-Catego" page, we think the savings is more like 35-45%.
>|
>| We're lovin' LINUX!
> `----
>
> http://www.stevencox.com/2007/08/net-to-linux-co.html
>
> Performance boosted significantly.
25% savings are so huge that every business will need to take this
seriously. That's a big chunk of money, even for a small IT department.
> No surprise given benchmarks like this new
> one:
>
> Comprehensive Linux Terminal Performance Comparison
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| Linux has an abundance of excellent terminal applications. Interestingly, I
>| could not find any decent comparison of their text display performance. Since
>| I use the command line a lot, I want text output that is as fast as possible.
>| When you compile a large project, you don?t want the console output to be the
>| limiting factor.
> `----
>
> http://martin.ankerl.com/2007/09/01/comprehensive-linux-terminal-performance-comparison/
>
> Watch Windows. What an embarrassment for a very limited and ugly shell.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |
|
|
