Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> Sinister Midget wrote:
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/01/02/
ms_struggles_to_discredit_linux/
>
> So? What about all the Linux advocates that sturggle to discredit
> Windows? Hypocrite.
>>> Just because it's Microsoft doesn't make it ok to Lie.
>>
>> Then stop it!
>
> I'm not the one lying here.
Sure, Fuddie. You're just using your usual brain-dead, immoral "logic"
to again attack Linux advocates, like they are "hypocrites" for
complaining about Micro$oft attempts to discredit Linux, while
simultaneously "discrediting" Windows. But you see, Fuddie, that's your
dishonest choice of words, implying that "the same thing" is happening on
both sides.
Advocates of fairness and freedom point-out the advantages of OSS and the
disadvantages of Windows and of the Micro$oft hegemony. They seek
*choice*.
Micro$oft, on the other hand, uses FUD, bribery, secrecy, and other
unethical tactics, in order to prevent freedom and choice. They seek to
*monopolize*.
These are NOT the same things! One is moral and ethical, the other is
NOT.
|
|
