On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:58:05 +0100, Hadron wrote:
> Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> * Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> provoke. For instance, they attacked me repeatedly after I said that if Tim's
>>>>>>> stalking in various Web sites continues, I'll contact the police (of course I
>>>>>>> did not mean this, but I needed him off my back because he's DDOSing me with
>>>>>>> personal attacks not only in COLA).
>>>>>
>>>>> So in other words, you'll say anything, whether true or not, to get your
>>>>> way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow, nice admission there Roy.
>>
>> Way to set up your own premise and conclusion, Erik.
>
> Are you mad?
>
>>
>>>>> But then many of us already knew that about you.
>>>>
>>>> Pot kettle black!
>>>
>>> Oh, please. You're comparing behavior that you attribe to me, to behavior
>>> Roy has just confessed to. You don't see the difference?
>>
>> Nope. You did dig up and post some rather noxious information about
>> someone, did not you?
>>
>>> And why is it that when I point out things that IBM does that Microsoft is
>>> criticized for, you whine about me using a "But they do it too" defense?
>>> Yet here you are in the exact sort of argument using PKB response, which is
>>> essentially a "But you do it too" defense.
>>>
>>> Why is it so hard for you to see how often and frequently Roy lies in an
>>> attempt to get his way? Why do you defend him when he's obviously lying?
>>
>> Um, because he really /isn't/ lying?
>
> He was lying.
>
>>
>>> And, more importantly, why are you defending him he ADMITS to lying?
>>
>> Because he didn't admit to lying? He admitted he didn't mean to follow
>> through on his threat. A silly thing, but not exactly a lie.
>
> So he threatened someone with something he had no intention of doing?
> And that is not lying? Are you really so bloody thick as you appear? And
> removing information you do not want others to see is not censorship?
> You're a raving loony man.
>>
>> Pot Kettle Black, man. You're the last guy who needs to be worrying
>> about Roy's veracity.
>
> Veracity? Go and see the doctor Liarnut. Seriously. You're losing the
> plot.
Linonut is either purposely playing the crazy Linux advocate, or he has
joined the gang of Roy Shills.
Speaking of Roy Schestowitz, he does seem to be quite erratic these days.
I hope he gets the medical help he needs.
It's obvious that in addition to his normal narcissistic behavior, he has
become quite paranoid as well.
There is no reason why he can't live a productive life and blend into
society like everyone else.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
|
|
