On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:32:36 -0500, Linonut wrote:
> * Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>
>>> In article <2658442.AtNKPR83cS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> provoke. For instance, they attacked me repeatedly after I said that if Tim's
>>>> stalking in various Web sites continues, I'll contact the police (of course I
>>>> did not mean this, but I needed him off my back because he's DDOSing me with
>>>> personal attacks not only in COLA).
>>
>> So in other words, you'll say anything, whether true or not, to get your
>> way.
>>
>> Wow, nice admission there Roy.
>>
>> But then many of us already knew that about you.
>
> Pot kettle black!
>
> -- Santayana
Oh, please. You're comparing behavior that you attribe to me, to behavior
Roy has just confessed to. You don't see the difference?
And why is it that when I point out things that IBM does that Microsoft is
criticized for, you whine about me using a "But they do it too" defense?
Yet here you are in the exact sort of argument using PKB response, which is
essentially a "But you do it too" defense.
Why is it so hard for you to see how often and frequently Roy lies in an
attempt to get his way? Why do you defend him when he's obviously lying?
And, more importantly, why are you defending him he ADMITS to lying?
|
|
