Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> ____/ Mark Kent on Tuesday 12 February 2008 06:51 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> ____/ John Locke on Monday 11 February 2008 21:02 : \____
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:43:39 +0000, Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>> Alfresco's Open Source Barometer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>>| One of the most interesting additions to the survey this year is a
>>>>>>| question about which office suite people use. Overall, OpenOffice.org
>>>>>>| chalks up a very respectable 24% to Microsoft Office's 66%. This is a
>>>>>>| much higher penetration than I would have guessed for open source on the
>>>>>>| desktop, and suggests that among those adopting open source programs
>>>>>>| OpenOffice.org is doing really well ? pretty much at the Firefox level
>>>>>>| of success.
>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
> http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=475&blogid=14
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last year it was 20% of The Register's reader who said they were using
>>>>>> OpenOffice.org.
>>>>>
>>>>>Interesting... the only interesting metric of foss usage is foss usage.
>>>>>As there is no market for linux itself, or at least, a very small one,
>>>>>it's not something you can quantify, since there's nothing to quantify,
>>>>>however, usage is the interesting thing.
>>>>>
>>>>>OO.org at 24% is large enough to be essentially unstoppable now, in
>>>>>spite of all Microsoft's efforts at corrupting both ECMA and ISO.
>>>>>
>>>> I think the days of high priced office solutions from Microsoft are
>>>> numbered. There are now other viable options...even Abiword
>>>> if you just need some word processing !
>>>
>>> This has just been acknowledged by Microsoft which set it's Office Live
>>> (read: Google catchup) free, despite the fact that a Microsoft manager said
>>> there was poor demand for it. It was roughly 4 months ago.
>>>
>>> OOXML is Microsoft's attempt to survive the Web era, making documents and
>>> programs incompatible unless they are from Microsoft.
>>>
>>
>> Several SME people I know are now using Google office and calendaring
>> and mail, essentially, they've moved their office support software
>> entirely to google's hosted services. I think that all the hassles
>> associated with running these things locally are just too much for most
>> people.
>
> Last year, Google claimed that over 100,000 had moved to Google Apps (from
> Microsoft Office most likely). The company keeps modest and quiet about it
> (same with Red Hat, to whom attitude is seen as crucial, so it rarely
> advertises). Did you know that a Microsoft puppet called the Burton Group
> issued anti-Google Apps studies? There was a whole Microsoft propaganda
> campaign against it. That's just how Microsoft competes. It's the only
> language it understands.
>
I presume that they're still trying to convince people that you won't
get sacked for using Microsoft. I don't think that this is true any
more.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |
|
|
