"Matt" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ma_xj.5211$Sa1.306@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tony Drudge wrote:
>> "Matt" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:oBJxj.5156$Sa1.2568@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 6:24 am, Matt <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>> Gates Foundation's Stonesifer Steps Back
>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>> | Patty Stonesifer wants to do something more interesting than spend
>>>>>> $38.7
>>>>>> | billion.
>>>>>> `----
>>>>>> http://www.forbes.com/2008/02/16/stonesifer-gates-foundation-face-mar...
>>>>>> We don't know exactly what she's going to do, but she's now sitting
>>>>>> down and figuring out a project that she can run with."
>>>> What did she see see, one has to wonder. Working for a seemingly
>>>> charitable (and rich) organization seems like a dream, no? Unless it
>>>> wasn't so...
>>> Looks like she was fired.
>>
>> It looks like you don't have a clue.
>>
>> You and your boyfriend Schestowitz sound like a couple of gossiping
>
> Not gossiping, just speculating, guessing from the text of the article,
> nothing more. I wouldn't expect anyone to take it too seriously.
Speculating that "she was fired." Quite moronic given that she announced
that she would leave at the end of 2008. So you think that they "fired her"
but she's going to stick around 10 more months anyway. Idiot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patty_Stonesifer
Patty Stonesifer is the Co-chair and chief executive officer of the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation. On February 7, 2008, she announced that she would
step aside from her role at the end of the year. She intends to help with
the search for her successor and remain involved with special projects.
>> school girls. No facts but plenty of gossip to get your panties in a
>> bunch.
>
> Please check your panties. I think they may be all bunched up.
Please check your facts. But I suppose that actually having the slighest
clue of what your 'speculating' about is secondary. Your primary goal is to
slurp the Schestowitz idiot who is equally as clueless as you.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
