Troy Kirkland wrote:
"Matt" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:V2_xj.5209$Sa1.3826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
____/ Matt on Friday 29 February 2008 01:54 : \____
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
On Feb 18, 6:24 am, Matt <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
Gates Foundation's Stonesifer Steps Back
,----[ Quote ]
| Patty Stonesifer wants to do something more interesting than spend
$38.7
| billion.
`----
http://www.forbes.com/2008/02/16/stonesifer-gates-foundation-face-mar...
We don't know exactly what she's going to do, but she's now sitting
down
and figuring out a project that she can run with."
What did she see see, one has to wonder. Working for a seemingly
charitable (and rich) organization seems like a dream, no? Unless it
wasn't so...
Looks like she was fired.
Really???
I'm guessing that just from the text of the article.
Translation - You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.
But that doesn't stop you from attempting to SLURP up to Schestowitz with a
"me too" anti-MS post.
She doesn't have a plan yet. She wants to do something more interesting,
but doesn't really have anything in mind. I mean it's as if they are
easing her out on amicable terms, firing her gently. That's all. Didn't
you read it that way?
Translation - You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.
But that doesn't stop you from attempting to SLURP up to Schestowitz with a
"me too" anti-MS post.
Well, excuse me. I didn't expect to evoke such hostility.
|
|
