Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <4780755.lXFOCSdyy1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Those 4 people are Tim Smith (the nym he uses is harlowmonkeys), Gary
>> Stewart (username flatfish) and somebody else from COLA who goes by
>> the name 'kretik' (I'm not sure if it's Erik, but he's too rude to be
>> Erik and he's certainly from COLA). I can't recall the username of
>
> I read your comments. Only about 70% earn a digg down. The 30% where
> you are on-topic and say something that isn't just a "me too" remark or
> spam get a digg up, to try to encourage you to improve.
>
> If you don't want to get dugg down, stay on topic, say something
> meaningful, and that you have not said 50 times before (and especially
> not a cut-and-paste of something you've said 50 times before).
>
> For example, there was a story in the politics section about "intel".
> It was clear from the summary that it was talking about "intelligence",
> not the chip maker. You posted a comment, stating that you had at first
> thought they were talking about the chip maker. Pointless, but I can
> see how you might think that was funny, so if you had stopped there, I
> would have neither dugg it up nor down. But you didn't stop there. You
> proceeded to say how Intel is evil and posted a dozen of the items from
> you "intel is evil" list. Dugg down.
Roybot is an experiment in AI. And not a very good one.
|
|
