Kier wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:17:05 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>
>> Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> * Peter Köhlmann peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>>
>>>>> Sometimes it goes the other way. Linksys moved their WRT54G product
>>>>> from Linux to Wind River (I think) after they were forced to release
>>>>> the GPL'd software.
>>>>
>>>> No, they did it because they needed a little less RAM then. But it
>>>> seems it was a bad decision, since the WRT54G is reported to be
>>>> unreliable.
>>>
>>> Oh, it is, I kept one for two days before returning that piece of crap.
>>>
>>>> Later they brought the WRT54GL version, which was (again) running
>>>> linux
>>
>> And yet I have one working without a problem under quite heavy
>> load. Strange eh? You liars aren't half full of it.
>
> Strange. Whenever a Linux advocate uses the argument 'it works for me',
> you squeal like a stuck pig and say they'll lying. But it's okay for you?
> How does that work again?
Thats his normal mode of operation. Since he is a "true linux advocate" and
others, except flatfish, are not, he can make exceptions from the rule
And Hadron Quark naturally ignores that this exact piece of equipment is
widely know for its unreliable working. So even *if* it worked for him (I
highly doubt that he has ever had one) it would still mean nothing compared
to the high number of problems reported
--
The Day Microsoft makes something that does not suck is probably
the day they start making vacuum cleaners.
|
|
