On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:33:19 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:15:30 +0000, Kier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:08:51 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:52:16 +0000, Kier wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:24:23 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:06:12 -0500, Tiki Weatherbee wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Kelsey Bjarnason" <kbjarnason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:avgf65-j7m.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:41:21 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bob <bob@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:10:59 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> SOS day after day.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you don't like it, don't come here.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Spike1 or Kier nym? "idiot" gives it away. Or is "Bob" just a lurker?
>>>>>>>>> Possibly a Kelsey shift but unlikely as it didn't make an inference to
>>>>>>>>> her own intelligence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Another fine "true linux advocacy post" from the "true linux advocate"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like the way he suggests it could be a "Kelsey shift". I'd like to see
>>>>>>> him come up with any evidence I have *ever* shifted. He can't, as I
>>>>>>> never have - I've never needed to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like the way Roy Schestowitz suggests people are "paid posters". I'd like
>>>>>> to see him come up with any evidence anyone here has *ever* been paid. He
>>>>>> can't, and he never will.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'Course, we wouldn't let little things like facts get in the way of
>>>>>>> Hadron's twisted little fantasies, would we?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Course, we wouldn't let little things like facts get in the way of
>>>>>> Schestowitz's twisted little fantasies, would we?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet at the same time he is accusing others of being paid posters, the
>>>>> evidence is pretty strong that he, Roy Schestowitz, is being paid to post.
>>>>
>>>> No, it isn't. The 'evidence' is non-existant. If you have any, let's see
>>>> it.
>>>
>>> Here is a project for you Kier.
>>> For one week, write a small reply to every one of Roy's messages here, on
>>> digg, on propeller, on his ever growing list of boycott sites etc.
>>>
>>> See how long it is taking you.
>>
>> Not proof.
>>
>>>
>>> Now factor in Roy's extended comments, extra links and so forth and now
>>> claim this isn't a FULL TIME JOB for any human being and said person would
>>> have little time to do anything else, like a real job for example.
>>>
>>> Now factor in Roy being a college student, albeit at a low rate college,
>>
>> Not a low-rate college, jerk.
>>
>>> but still being a student requires time for class and studies.
>>
>> He's a *post-graduate* student, dimbulb.
>>
>>>
>>> Factor in how pissed he gets when his comments get buried.
>>> Factor in why he vehemently opposes a digest post.
>>> Factor in his misleading subject lines.
>>
>> NOt remotely proof that he gets paid, whatsoever.
>>
>>>
>>> The only reason something like a digg rating would bother a person is if he
>>> was being paid for the 'success of his work.
>>
>> Lying bollocks.
>>
>>> Most people don't take it seriously.
>>>
>>> Now consider the alternatives:
>>>
>>> 1. Roy Schestowitz is being paid to do this full time.
>>> 2. There is more than one person posting as Roy Schestowitz.
>>> 3. The process is pretty much automated, which violates the TOS of digg and
>>> netscape/propeller BTW.
>>> 4. All of the above.
>>>
>>> I'm voting for #4 myself.
>>
>> I'm voting that you are a lying troll.
>>
>> So, where is your PROOF? Not accusations, not suppositions, not
>> veiled and not-so-veiled insults, PROOF, that Roy is paid to post?
>>
>>>
>>> Go ahead and try it for yourself.....
>>>
>>> I did and reached the conclusion he is a professional spammer who does
>>> nothing all day and night but post to the Internet.
>>
>> That is because you are a lying troll.
>>
>>>
>>> It's pure common sense, but I doubt you have the balls to try it.
>>> In that respect you are a lot like Roy Schestowitz.
>>
>> Liar.
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Schestowitz is a fake, fraud and a phony and sooner or later he is going to
>>>>> have a falling out with his benefactor(s) and the truth will come out.
>>>>
>>>> *What* truth? That he's a somewhat over-enthusiastic Linux advocate? We
>>>> know that already. Anything else is only in your mind.
>>>
>>> It may have started out that way but that's not the way it is now.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For now, have patience and just sit back and enjoy the show!
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you dry up and blow away?
>>>
>>> Why?
>>> I'm having too much fun.
>>
>> Yes, posting reams and reams of lying filth about Linux advocates. Do
>> *you* get paid, flatty?
>
> Just as I suspected.
> Your head is buried so far up your ass you can't think clearly.
Wrong.
>
> Forget about your obvious allegiance to Roy Schestowitz and his gang and
> attempt just for a second to think with an open mind.
You imagine some 'alleigiance I do not have.
>
> Perform my little experiment and see for yourself.
> You are just too scared to learn the truth.
*What* truth, flatty? YOu keep coming out with accusations, but nothing to
back 'em up.
>
> And while I am scolding you, I fail to understand why you keep defending
Sorry to disappoint you, pal, but you are not 'scolding' me in the least.
> those who call you a troll and who even on a good day, only keep you around
> because you are better than no advocate at all even though you disagree
> with most of the lunacy they post.
> Especially that sewage from Mark Kent.
Er, where do you see me defending Mark Kent?
>
> Try the experiment.
> Stop playing with the distribution of the day for a week, heck even for a
> couple of days, and report back.
I do not have a 'distribution of the day', flatty.
>
> As for Roy being a post graduate student, that is indeed scary.
> What has the educational system sunk to.
What makes you superior, nymshifter and liar?
> Between being a fresher fluffer during freshman week and his paid for Linux
> spamming gig when does he get time to study?
You have still provided *no* proof whatever that Roy gets paid to post, so
stop with the accusations, flatty.
--
Kier
|
|
