On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:53:12 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:19:49 +0000, Kier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:33:19 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:15:30 +0000, Kier wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:08:51 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:52:16 +0000, Kier wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:24:23 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:06:12 -0500, Tiki Weatherbee wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Kelsey Bjarnason" <kbjarnason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:avgf65-j7m.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:41:21 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> bob <bob@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:10:59 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SOS day after day.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't like it, don't come here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Spike1 or Kier nym? "idiot" gives it away. Or is "Bob" just a lurker?
>>>>>>>>>>> Possibly a Kelsey shift but unlikely as it didn't make an inference to
>>>>>>>>>>> her own intelligence.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Another fine "true linux advocacy post" from the "true linux advocate"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I like the way he suggests it could be a "Kelsey shift". I'd like to see
>>>>>>>>> him come up with any evidence I have *ever* shifted. He can't, as I
>>>>>>>>> never have - I've never needed to.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I like the way Roy Schestowitz suggests people are "paid posters". I'd like
>>>>>>>> to see him come up with any evidence anyone here has *ever* been paid. He
>>>>>>>> can't, and he never will.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 'Course, we wouldn't let little things like facts get in the way of
>>>>>>>>> Hadron's twisted little fantasies, would we?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 'Course, we wouldn't let little things like facts get in the way of
>>>>>>>> Schestowitz's twisted little fantasies, would we?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet at the same time he is accusing others of being paid posters, the
>>>>>>> evidence is pretty strong that he, Roy Schestowitz, is being paid to post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it isn't. The 'evidence' is non-existant. If you have any, let's see
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is a project for you Kier.
>>>>> For one week, write a small reply to every one of Roy's messages here, on
>>>>> digg, on propeller, on his ever growing list of boycott sites etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> See how long it is taking you.
>>>>
>>>> Not proof.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now factor in Roy's extended comments, extra links and so forth and now
>>>>> claim this isn't a FULL TIME JOB for any human being and said person would
>>>>> have little time to do anything else, like a real job for example.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now factor in Roy being a college student, albeit at a low rate college,
>>>>
>>>> Not a low-rate college, jerk.
>>>>
>>>>> but still being a student requires time for class and studies.
>>>>
>>>> He's a *post-graduate* student, dimbulb.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Factor in how pissed he gets when his comments get buried.
>>>>> Factor in why he vehemently opposes a digest post.
>>>>> Factor in his misleading subject lines.
>>>>
>>>> NOt remotely proof that he gets paid, whatsoever.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only reason something like a digg rating would bother a person is if he
>>>>> was being paid for the 'success of his work.
>>>>
>>>> Lying bollocks.
>>>>
>>>>> Most people don't take it seriously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now consider the alternatives:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Roy Schestowitz is being paid to do this full time.
>>>>> 2. There is more than one person posting as Roy Schestowitz.
>>>>> 3. The process is pretty much automated, which violates the TOS of digg and
>>>>> netscape/propeller BTW.
>>>>> 4. All of the above.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm voting for #4 myself.
>>>>
>>>> I'm voting that you are a lying troll.
>>>>
>>>> So, where is your PROOF? Not accusations, not suppositions, not
>>>> veiled and not-so-veiled insults, PROOF, that Roy is paid to post?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Go ahead and try it for yourself.....
>>>>>
>>>>> I did and reached the conclusion he is a professional spammer who does
>>>>> nothing all day and night but post to the Internet.
>>>>
>>>> That is because you are a lying troll.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's pure common sense, but I doubt you have the balls to try it.
>>>>> In that respect you are a lot like Roy Schestowitz.
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Schestowitz is a fake, fraud and a phony and sooner or later he is going to
>>>>>>> have a falling out with his benefactor(s) and the truth will come out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *What* truth? That he's a somewhat over-enthusiastic Linux advocate? We
>>>>>> know that already. Anything else is only in your mind.
>>>>>
>>>>> It may have started out that way but that's not the way it is now.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For now, have patience and just sit back and enjoy the show!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why don't you dry up and blow away?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why?
>>>>> I'm having too much fun.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, posting reams and reams of lying filth about Linux advocates. Do
>>>> *you* get paid, flatty?
>>>
>>> Just as I suspected.
>>> Your head is buried so far up your ass you can't think clearly.
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>>>
>>> Forget about your obvious allegiance to Roy Schestowitz and his gang and
>>> attempt just for a second to think with an open mind.
>>
>>
>> You imagine some 'alleigiance I do not have.
>>
>>>
>>> Perform my little experiment and see for yourself.
>>> You are just too scared to learn the truth.
>>
>> *What* truth, flatty? YOu keep coming out with accusations, but nothing to
>> back 'em up.
>>
>>>
>>> And while I am scolding you, I fail to understand why you keep defending
>>
>> Sorry to disappoint you, pal, but you are not 'scolding' me in the least.
>>
>>> those who call you a troll and who even on a good day, only keep you around
>>> because you are better than no advocate at all even though you disagree
>>> with most of the lunacy they post.
>>> Especially that sewage from Mark Kent.
>>
>> Er, where do you see me defending Mark Kent?
>>
>>>
>>> Try the experiment.
>>> Stop playing with the distribution of the day for a week, heck even for a
>>> couple of days, and report back.
>>
>> I do not have a 'distribution of the day', flatty.
>>
>>>
>>> As for Roy being a post graduate student, that is indeed scary.
>>> What has the educational system sunk to.
>>
>> What makes you superior, nymshifter and liar?
>>
>>> Between being a fresher fluffer during freshman week and his paid for Linux
>>> spamming gig when does he get time to study?
>>
>> You have still provided *no* proof whatever that Roy gets paid to post, so
>> stop with the accusations, flatty.
>
> I asked you to try a little experiment and draw your own conclusions.
Why should I? *You* made the accusation, *you* provide the proof
> You've had so much Koolaid you can't even manage that.
I don't drink your fucking 'Koolaid, flatty. And I don't believe your lies.
--
Kier
|
|
