____/ Kier on Tuesday 22 January 2008 21:15 : \____
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:08:51 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:52:16 +0000, Kier wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:24:23 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:06:12 -0500, Tiki Weatherbee wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Kelsey Bjarnason" <kbjarnason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:avgf65-j7m.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:41:21 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> bob <bob@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:10:59 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SOS day after day.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you don't like it, don't come here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Spike1 or Kier nym? "idiot" gives it away. Or is "Bob" just a lurker?
>>>>>>>> Possibly a Kelsey shift but unlikely as it didn't make an inference to
>>>>>>>> her own intelligence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another fine "true linux advocacy post" from the "true linux advocate"
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I like the way he suggests it could be a "Kelsey shift". I'd like to
>>>>>> see
>>>>>> him come up with any evidence I have *ever* shifted. He can't, as I
>>>>>> never have - I've never needed to.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the way Roy Schestowitz suggests people are "paid posters". I'd
>>>>> like
>>>>> to see him come up with any evidence anyone here has *ever* been paid.
>>>>> He can't, and he never will.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Course, we wouldn't let little things like facts get in the way of
>>>>>> Hadron's twisted little fantasies, would we?
>>>>>
>>>>> 'Course, we wouldn't let little things like facts get in the way of
>>>>> Schestowitz's twisted little fantasies, would we?
>>>>
>>>> Yet at the same time he is accusing others of being paid posters, the
>>>> evidence is pretty strong that he, Roy Schestowitz, is being paid to post.
>>>
>>> No, it isn't. The 'evidence' is non-existant. If you have any, let's see
>>> it.
>>
>> Here is a project for you Kier.
>> For one week, write a small reply to every one of Roy's messages here, on
>> digg, on propeller, on his ever growing list of boycott sites etc.
>>
>> See how long it is taking you.
>
> Not proof.
>
>>
>> Now factor in Roy's extended comments, extra links and so forth and now
>> claim this isn't a FULL TIME JOB for any human being and said person would
>> have little time to do anything else, like a real job for example.
>>
>> Now factor in Roy being a college student, albeit at a low rate college,
>
> Not a low-rate college, jerk.
>
>> but still being a student requires time for class and studies.
>
> He's a *post-graduate* student, dimbulb.
I finished almost all of my practical PhD work when I was 23. The trolls have
to cope with the fact that I *do* have a lot more free time nowadays.
>> Factor in how pissed he gets when his comments get buried.
>> Factor in why he vehemently opposes a digest post.
>> Factor in his misleading subject lines.
>
> NOt remotely proof that he gets paid, whatsoever.
No, that's just one of their Big Lies. They spread that elsewhere too.
>> The only reason something like a digg rating would bother a person is if he
>> was being paid for the 'success of his work.
>
> Lying bollocks.
>
>> Most people don't take it seriously.
>>
>> Now consider the alternatives:
>>
>> 1. Roy Schestowitz is being paid to do this full time.
>> 2. There is more than one person posting as Roy Schestowitz.
>> 3. The process is pretty much automated, which violates the TOS of digg and
>> netscape/propeller BTW.
>> 4. All of the above.
>>
>> I'm voting for #4 myself.
>
> I'm voting that you are a lying troll.
>
> So, where is your PROOF? Not accusations, not suppositions, not
> veiled and not-so-veiled insults, PROOF, that Roy is paid to post?
>
>>
>> Go ahead and try it for yourself.....
>>
>> I did and reached the conclusion he is a professional spammer who does
>> nothing all day and night but post to the Internet.
>
> That is because you are a lying troll.
>
>>
>> It's pure common sense, but I doubt you have the balls to try it.
>> In that respect you are a lot like Roy Schestowitz.
>
> Liar.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Schestowitz is a fake, fraud and a phony and sooner or later he is going
>>>> to have a falling out with his benefactor(s) and the truth will come out.
>>>
>>> *What* truth? That he's a somewhat over-enthusiastic Linux advocate? We
>>> know that already. Anything else is only in your mind.
>>
>> It may have started out that way but that's not the way it is now.
>>
>>>>
>>>> For now, have patience and just sit back and enjoy the show!
>>>
>>> Why don't you dry up and blow away?
>>
>> Why?
>> I'm having too much fun.
>
> Yes, posting reams and reams of lying filth about Linux advocates. Do
> *you* get paid, flatty?
I can't imagine a person that would want to defend a company that is
responsible so much damage in the IT industry. PJ, like myself, sacrificed a
lot to try and restore some justice (mind the bogus SCO case). They tried to
accuse her so many time of receiving payments from IBM when she in fact can
barely pay her bills (and IBM swore under oath that it isn't anything to do
with PJ).
That's just the type of treatment you come to expect when you 'dare' to
criticise scum like Microsoft.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Open minds, open source
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem: 515500k total, 445956k used, 69544k free, 1488k buffers
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
