-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ bbgruff on Friday 18 July 2008 11:18 : \____
> http://nhqc3s.nato.int/architecture/_docs/NISPv2/volume2/ch03s04.html
>
> OpenDocument ISO/IEC 26300:2006
> (Under "Mandatory" - just search for OpenDocument)
>
> I can't see any mention of OOXML, but perhaps I missed it?
>
> I think this is great, because we are all on the same side now, aren't we?
> Microsoft hasn't implemented OOXML, but IS implementing ODF, so we can all
> talk to each other, the playing field is level, and MS will be able to sell
> its wares based on them being better, rather than having all those nasty
> people (commies, socialists, misfits, etc.) whining about "proprietary
> formats" and "lock in".
>
> Oh joy! Microsoft must be *so* happy, and I am of course delighted for them.
Microsoft will be *delighted*. It finally intends to support *a* standard in
2009 (at the earliest). Other than that -- and until then -- there are two
binary formats in Microsoft Office + some semi-baked, half-hearted plugins.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
"I don’t understand how IE is going to win. The current path is simply to copy
everything that Netscape does packaging and product wise."
--Jim Allchin, Microsoft
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkiAlqgACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4tlgCfaaRzn7NHlbNACLLyGTanjpYJ
eIMAoKtp8UHQ0PO6PVZ6mT/KBDTN5mEJ
=8zfS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
