In article <22764929.uKMMqel1j1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> indirectly:
> So, the question arises: Why is De Icaza criticizing the "deal" now? What's
> changed? The terms of Icaza's employment? His salary? His VP status? His
> duties? GNOME's GPL status?
>
> It's time De Icaza comes clean."
It's time the writer learned to read more carefully. Miguel called for
cooperation. He didn't call for this *specific* deal. A year later, he
says he doesn't like this *particular* deal. That's in no way a change
or inconsistent with his statement a year ago that called for more
cooperation.
--
--Tim Smith
|
|
