Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Cloud Computing Very Good for Linux, Scary Stuff to Microsoft

  • Subject: [News] Cloud Computing Very Good for Linux, Scary Stuff to Microsoft
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:37:53 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Enterprise Unix Roundup: Unix Heads for the Clouds

,----[ Quote ]
| And if — if — cloud computing advances to the point where we do indeed use 
| devices that connect to the cloud with virtually no on-board software, 
| Microsoft will be shut out of that part of the cloud, too. Its embedded OS 
| has not demonstrated a real market strength or scalability. But Linux has.   
| 
| [...]
| 
| And out on the servers and mainframes that will be serving up this cloud 
| goodness? Unix, BSD, Linux ... all secure, all ready to scale for any sized 
| job.  
| 
| Pretty scary ... for Microsoft. 
`----

http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3731186

"Pearly Gates and Em-Ballmer
    One promises you heaven and the other prepares you for the grave. "

                                --Ray Noorda, Novell


Related:

IBM-Google partnership merges best features of Internet and corporate
computing, IBM exec says

,----[ Quote ]
| Isn’t it an advantage to be more diversified, or would you rather rely on a 
| huge cash cow like Windows? 
| 
| Diversity is generally viewed as an advantage. We think it is. On the other 
| hand, having a monopoly has its advantages too. What more could you say? They 
| make an enormous amount of money on Office and Windows. They have a very low 
| cost of sales, relatively modest amount of development. It’s enormously 
| profitable. And that’s the characteristic of a monopoly, which you’re allowed 
| to have. You’re just not allowed to abuse them.      
`----

http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/020708-mills.html?fsrc=rss-linux-news


Is Red Hat's New Development Environment Destined for an Amazon or IBM Cloud?

,----[ Quote ]
| So who will be the one to move their tools environment to the Amazon cloud 
| first? Perhaps Amazon will offer several tools options, such as one for web 
| apps and mashups, and another (or two) for Java development? You know you 
| want to, Jeff.   
`----

http://seekingalpha.com/article/56865-is-red-hat-s-new-development-environment-destined-for-an-amazon-or-ibm-cloud?source=yahoo


Aiming for the Clouds: The Red Hat Q&A

,----[ Quote ]
| Q: To get back to the original question, what is your assessment of the 
| potential impact? 
| 
| A: It’s early, but November’s news was a good indication that innovation 
| amongst economic models and deployment scenarios is still possible. Not to 
| dismiss the importance of some of the new features of RHEL 5.1, but over the 
| longer term I think AOS and the Cloud offering are far more important than 
| mere bells and whistles, because they make Red Hat a competitor in markets 
| where its penetration is currently low. Even if it’s success in those areas, 
| then, is minimal, the news remains very significant.      
`----

http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/11/19/redhat_cloud/


Will the biggest clouds stay open source?

,----[ Quote ]
| Everyone wants to become Google these days. In a way.
| 
| Google runs Linux.
| 
| A lot of enterprises, from banking to health care, are now looking to deploy 
| gigantic Internet-facing applications to customer sets numbering in the tens 
| of millions. (Government, too.)  
| 
| The biggest and best IT system suppliers are gearing up for what they 
| call “cloud” computing. IBM floated its offering today.   
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1684


Xcerion's Internet Cloud Forms Over Google and Microsoft

,----[ Quote ]
| If successful, it may be able to further erode the power Microsoft
| derives from control of the desktop, to beat Google at its
| software-as-a-service play, and to make commodity Linux boxes more
| viable as a computing platform for the masses.
`----

http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=R2FGBWGYKLN5OQSNDLPCKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=197700815&queryText=xml
http://tinyurl.com/ynkp9q


IBM's Blue Cloud: The Tipping Point for Enterprise IT as Service

,----[ Quote ]
| IBM's Blue Cloud, arriving in the first half of 2008, will use IBM 
| BladeCenter servers, a Linux operating system, Xen-based virtualization and 
| the company's own Tivoli management software.  
`----

http://seekingalpha.com/article/54406-ibm-s-blue-cloud-the-tipping-point-for-enterprise-it-as-service?source=yahoo


IBM to turn datacenters into 'computing cloud'

,----[ Quote
| IBM is calling the initiative Blue Cloud, and compared its significance to 
| its decision several years ago to throw its weight behind Linux, which helped 
| the open-source OS become more widely accepted by corporations.   
`----

http://news.yahoo.com/s/infoworld/20071115/tc_infoworld/93434


Red Hat Pits Itself Against VMware

,----[ Quote ]
| Red Hat’s new goal is to underpin 50% of the world’s servers by 2015.
| 
| And since virtualization is projected to take over the world by then that’s a 
| lot of Xen virtualization – and there’s no extra cost in it like there is 
| with VMware since it’s bundled with RHEL. (Red Hat’s telling people they’ll 
| save $20,000-$30,000 a server.)    
`----

http://www.clientservernews.com/


RHEL just tripled the size of its ISV ecosystem!

,----[ Quote ]
| Through that series of announcements, Red Hat is lining up its complete RHEL 
| strategy and making it clear that it can fit all deployment scenarios - 
| traditional or emerging - through the exact same RHEL bits. That proves the 
| flexibility of RHEL as a distribution and also factually multiplies the size 
| of RHEL’s ecosystem by further enabling all existing RHEL’s ISV on two new 
| emerging scenarios, Virtual Appliances and Cloud Computing. While that might 
| seem like a trivial statement, it is far from the truth. Just look at VMWare 
| for example: while they are getting great traction in the virtualization 
| field, it is going to be very difficult for them to enter the two emerging 
| fields discussed above, as they have a pretty much empty ISV ecosystem today. 
| And you don’t build an ISV ecosystem overnight (you can partner with one or 
| acquire one, but not build one overnight).           
`----

http://sacha.labourey.com/2007/11/14/rhel-just-tripled-the-size-of-its-isv-ecosystem/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index