Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft Shill Seemingly Planted for OOXML in Poland

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft Shill Seemingly Planted for OOXML in Poland
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:36:31 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Freelance
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Possible manipulation around OOXML process in Poland

,----[ Quote ]
| Just to remind you, on Thursday’s meeting 12 members voted for OOXML, 10 
| members voted against it and 2 abstained from voting. As the consensus has 
| not been achieved, Andrukiewicz decided that the voting should continue by 
| e-mail and all the missing members should be allowed to vote. What she did 
| not mention is that if the missing members fail to send her an e-mail with 
| their stance, it will be automatically assumed they vote yes. This is one of 
| the crazy rules of PKN process of opinioning new ISO standards.      
`----

http://polishlinux.org/poland/possible-manipulation-around-ooxml-process-in-poland/

Polish chairwoman distributes Microsoft propaganda

,----[ Quote ]
| The Chairwoman of the polish Technical Committee has distributed 
| documentation about the BRM authored by Microsoft. She has also changed the 
| voting rules for the email ballot to "If you don't vote, it is counted as a 
| YES", and she has threatened to sue committee members if they spread 
| accusations. What a nice broken chairwoman they have in Poland.    
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-49455/polish-chairwoman-distributes-microsoft-propaganda

Perhaps Microsoft paid handsomely? The EU Commission is already investigating
Microsoft/Poland for this abuse. Expect fines, just as Microsoft approaches
debt.


Related:

"Abstain from voting"

,----[ Quote
| Evil! "Abstain from voting" means no new vote will get submitted, so the 
| September vote will be carried! In the case of Poland it was an approval vote 
| for the OOOXML standard with comments attached. Yes, Poland felt it could 
| support the approval of a standard candidate that got more than 2300 pages of 
| dispositions of comments. And now the logic I fail to get is: if we fail to 
| approve we do nothing and carry the previous approval vote. ISO procudures 
| sometimes feel like a witch test.      
| 
| "Abstain from voting" != submission of an "Abstain" vote.
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-48992/abstain-from-voting


Poland Fails to Approve OOXML; Chairman Decides Members Can Vote by Email 10
More Days - huh?

,----[ Quote ]
| This is different. There is a report by Borys Musielak of PolishLinux.org 
| that Poland met to vote on OOXML on Thursday. Of 45 members of the committee 
| eligible to vote, 24 showed up to vote, and it split almost down the middle, 
| with 12 for, 10 against and 2 abstaining. This is extraordinary, since Poland 
| voted yes in September, despite the technical committee being opposed. I call 
| that progress.     
| 
| But here is the worrying part: when it became clear that there was no 
| consensus, and it was not going to be a Yes vote, the chairman "decided to 
| allow the missing members to vote by e-mail during the next 10 days".  
| 
| What to make of a process that keeps reinventing itself as it goes along? 
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080322203811784


No consensus over OOXML in Poland, yet

,----[ Quote ]
| Last Thursday PKN (Polish Normalization Committee) had a meeting on which it 
| was supposed to come up with the decision concerning Polish recommendation 
| for ISO/IEC DIS 29500 (OOXML) proposed standard. The common stance has not 
| been acheived.   
| 
| [...]
| 
| Yes, we do know a few more details concerning the process and the type of 
| dirty politics that took place just before and during the meeting, but we are 
| not going to releal it just yet, hoping that the chairman of KT 182 and the 
| PKN itself makes a proper decision in the end (which is to abstain from 
| voting as there has been no consensus about OOXML in KT).    
`----

http://polishlinux.org/poland/no-consensus-over-ooxml-in-poland-yet/


ODF Alliance Hails Brazil, India, Italy, and Poland for Recognizing
OpenDocument Format

,----[ Quote ]
| The OpenDocument Format Alliance (ODF Alliance), a broad
| cross-section of organizations, academia and industry dedicated
| to improving access to electronic government documents, today
| applauded Brazil's decision to recommend ODF as the government's
| preferred format; India's decision to use ODF at a major state
| government agency; and Italy's decision to recognize ODF as
| national standard.
| 
| The Alliance also recognized Poland, too, for demonstrating serious
| interest in adopting ODF in the wake of a national meeting held for
| its government with broad participants from industry and non-profit
| agencies.
`----

http://www5.sys-con.com/read/306120_p.htm


Poland against OOXML?

,----[ Quote ]
| Polish Technical Committee no 171 has just voted 80% against the adoption 
| OOXML as an ISO standard [PL]. 
`----

http://polishlinux.org/poland/poland-against-ooxml/


Polish National Interoperability Framework promotes Open Standards

,----[ Quote ]
| This basically means that Microsoft’s Office Open XML will not be 
| treated as open standard, thus not preferred in Polish e-Government 
| services, making OpenDocument Format the office standard of choice. 
`----

http://polishlinux.org/gnu/polish-national-interoperability-framework-promotes-open-standards/


Poland says "Yes, with comments" to OOXML

http://sciitnews.com/news_4055.html


Poland votes yes on OOXML

,----[ Quote ]
| Several protests were sent already to PKN and TC 182 on behalf of: Free and 
| Open Source Foundation, TC 171 members, Google Poland, IBM Poland, but I 
| really doubt they will make the difference in Polish vote among ISO. The 
| whole process was planned to the last minute so that there is not enough time 
| to protest or make any changes. Although it is not as clear situation of 
| vote-buying as in Sweden, it strikes me as something from typical Microsoft 
| lobbying portfolio.      
`----

http://wanted.eu.org/en/computers/microsoft/poland_votes_yes_on_ooxml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index