On Nov 19, 7:45 pm, Chris Ahlstrom <lino...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, cc belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 19, 7:04 am, Chris Ahlstrom <lino...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> > On 2008-11-19, Terry Porter <linu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:22:54 -0500, Ezekiel wrote:
>
> >> >>> So there you have it. Looks pretty much like proof to me that Roy
> >> >>> Schestowitz has automated his spamming efforts.
>
> >> >> Roy S advocates Linux, you are the spammer here.
>
> >> > Roy also conveniently puts [News] so I filter them out using roy's name
> >> > and [News].
>
> >> > Easy Peasy. Unlike some of the trolls and spammers here.
>
> >> >> If you don't like reading Linux advocacy on COLA, please feel free to go
> >> >> elsewhere, perhaps alt.ima.wintroll.
>
> >> > Or at least learn to use a decent Usenet filter.
>
> >> Bitching about Roy is part of their anti-Linux-advocacy agenda. The more
> >> you post about Linux (or against Microsoft), the louder the bitching
> >> becomes.
>
> > Disagree. Roy posts alot, so he is an easy target. Roy posts alot of
> > errors, so he is an easy target. Roy repeats the posts with errors, so
> > he is an easy target. Roy posts alot about his paranoid fantasies, so
> > he is an easy target. Although some posters may actually be anti-
> > Linux, I really can't say for sure, most are anti-stupidity and anti-
> > hypocrisy which Roy seems to be full of and eager to display. The fact
> > that Roy admits to posting massive quantities of material without
> > proof-reading makes him an acceptable target for some (but definately
> > not all) the grief that comes his way in my opinion. It has nothing to
> > do with Linux or Microsoft.
>
> Oh, Roy is well above a lot of others in his quality of poster. Well above.
I disagree. At best it's the same quality as whatever news site or
blog it came from originally. Mostly, well...it's already been said.
You can see how someone could be pro-linux and anti-Roy's posts though
can't you? Whether you think they have legit reasons or not.
> And you really haven't grokked the content of DFS's, Moshe's, and Ezekiel's
> unsavory postings about Roy, have you?
>
I made sure to mention that not all of it was warranted, referring
specifically to the "gender" posts among others.
|
|
