After takin' a swig o' grog, cc belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> On Nov 19, 7:45 pm, Chris Ahlstrom <lino...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Oh, Roy is well above a lot of others in his quality of poster. Well above.
>
> I disagree. At best it's the same quality as whatever news site or
> blog it came from originally.
Exactly. And those are far above the usual Wintroll quality.
> Mostly, well...it's already been said.
> You can see how someone could be pro-linux and anti-Roy's posts though
> can't you? Whether you think they have legit reasons or not.
My take has always been that the links are of interest often enough to
make it worth the occasional propaganda piece, weak piece, or promotion for
the boycottnovell site.
>> And you really haven't grokked the content of DFS's, Moshe's, and Ezekiel's
>> unsavory postings about Roy, have you?
>
> I made sure to mention that not all of it was warranted, referring
> specifically to the "gender" posts among others.
"Not all of it was warranted"? /Most/ of what they post is not warranted.
--
Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love).
-- Spock, "The Lights of Zetar", stardate 5725.6
|
|
