Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Microsoft-Sponsored "Net Applications" Hand-tweaks 'Statistics'

Hash: SHA1

____/ unionpenny@xxxxxxxxx on Saturday 07 February 2009 19:02 : \____

> On Feb 6, 11:36 am, "Ezekiel" <z...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> <unionpe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:776a5d67-ec66-4299-aa48-023aae924dda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Feb 6, 7:10 am, "Ezekiel" <z...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> "Rex Ballard" <rex.ball...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >>news:83745b6c-8dff-45d7-bad5-fede8e5ee3fd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > On Feb 6, 6:48 am, George Kettleborough
>> >> > <g.kettleboro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> On 06/02/09 11:09, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> >> > When net applications was soliciting sites to be part of their
>> >> > counter, it gave a pretty good clue as to why the counts are a bit
>> >> > "off". The wanted sites to serve up this ActiveX control that would
>> >> > got to user's browsers and count the individual users, sending the
>> >> > stats to Net Applications' counter via http post requests.
>> >> Prove it. You have zero proof of what Net Applications "wanted to do" and
>> >> you spew this nonsense out over and over again.
>> >Do you have any inside information about what Net Applications "wanted
>> >to do"?
>> Learn to read - it's Rex, not me who's making claims of what Net
>> Applications "wanted to do."  If he's going to make these claims then he
>> needs to prove how he could possibly know this. I'm not the one making
>> ridiculous claims...it's your fellow "advocate" who is.
>> >You scream "prove it" quite a lot.  Just what are you looking for?
>> How about "proof" for starters. You know... something to backup these
>> ridiculous claims.
>> > A press release from Microsoft saying Rex is correct?
>> Let's start with anything that can backup his ridiculous claims.
>> > Hell, even with court released evidence, you would
>> > find SOME way to make the "proof" inconsequential.
>> According to Rex all of this information was "sealed by the courts" yet
>> somehow Rex is the only man in America who knows the contents of the sealed
>> files.
>> >I really like the harping you were doing against Rex a few days ago.
>> It's not just a few days ago. I jump on that liar every time he opens his
>> pie-hole.
>> >Remember?  You had no problem with the vile, petty, disgusting, or
>> >illegal things Microsoft has done to their partners, customers,
>> >competitors, or the community at large.  Your whining was that
>> >internal communications made public by the court is not a public
>> >admission.  "How much can you pervert the truth without actually
>> >lying?"
>> Let's start with Rex's fable of how the "Vista EULA gives Microsoft the
>> right to access *ANY* file on your computer for *ANY* reason at all."
>> Talk about perverting the truth. Do backup Rex on that idiotic lie and tell
>> me how you actually believe this nonsense.
>> >Wow!  How much more like Scientology can Microsoft get?
>> How much more Kool-Aide can the zealots in the Linux cult drink?
>> >> > This of course is a problem because most people who use other browsers
>> >> > use them because they don't want Active X invading their PCs all the
>> >> > time.
>> >> The real problem is that you post your random hallucinations here as
>> >> "facts."
>> >You are very good, Ezekiel.  How much does MS pay you to go slogging
>> >through the slums of the internet?  A goon of your quality should get
>> >a raise.
>> Another idiot who thinks that people are paid to post to some obscure "slum"
>> newsgroup that few actually read.
> No.  Just you.  I took a quick look at your recent posting history ...
> very impressive.  You spend a startling amount of time interacting
> with people you despise.  If you aren't getting paid for this, you
> have a serious personality problem ... and you are a sucker as well.
> You are way too good to do this for free.  DFS and Hadron are pikers
> compared to you.  The way you made Richard Rasker look so stupid
> because his wife's college uses floppies and off-line computers for
> tests was absolutely beautiful.  Richard has no authority at the
> college, no knowledge of how the classes operate, or why.  Yet you
> made him look like an ignorant fool.  Effectively blaming a passer by
> for unrelated complex problems takes real talent, Ezekiel.  You should
> be getting paid to be here.
> I notice you did not deny getting paid, why not?  This is usenet.
> There is no penalty for lying here, it won't matter if you lie or tell
> the truth.

Scott Douglas (aka Scott Nudds, VistaKing, Ezekiel and dozens more) has posted
here for many years. At the heights of his career he repeatedly called for the
slitting of throats of Linux users.

Scott "Ezekiel" Douglas will be better served in a nuthouse. That's why I
killfiled him and never interact with the creature.

- -- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      | "This sig seemed like a good idea at the time..."
http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer |  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 1.08 1.05 1.13 10/250 765
      http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index