"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3017685.Ls0apC7cqb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ____/ unionpenny@xxxxxxxxx on Saturday 07 February 2009 19:02 : \____
>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 6, 11:36 am, "Ezekiel" <z...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> <unionpe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:776a5d67-ec66-4299-aa48-023aae924dda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Feb 6, 7:10 am, "Ezekiel" <z...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >> "Rex Ballard" <rex.ball...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>
>>> >>news:83745b6c-8dff-45d7-bad5-fede8e5ee3fd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> >> > On Feb 6, 6:48 am, George Kettleborough
>>> >> > <g.kettleboro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> >> On 06/02/09 11:09, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > When net applications was soliciting sites to be part of their
>>> >> > counter, it gave a pretty good clue as to why the counts are a bit
>>> >> > "off". The wanted sites to serve up this ActiveX control that
>>> >> > would
>>> >> > got to user's browsers and count the individual users, sending the
>>> >> > stats to Net Applications' counter via http post requests.
>>>
>>> >> Prove it. You have zero proof of what Net Applications "wanted to
>>> >> do" and
>>> >> you spew this nonsense out over and over again.
>>>
>>> >Do you have any inside information about what Net Applications "wanted
>>> >to do"?
>>>
>>> Learn to read - it's Rex, not me who's making claims of what Net
>>> Applications "wanted to do." If he's going to make these claims then he
>>> needs to prove how he could possibly know this. I'm not the one making
>>> ridiculous claims...it's your fellow "advocate" who is.
>>>
>>> >You scream "prove it" quite a lot. Just what are you looking for?
>>>
>>> How about "proof" for starters. You know... something to backup these
>>> ridiculous claims.
>>>
>>> > A press release from Microsoft saying Rex is correct?
>>>
>>> Let's start with anything that can backup his ridiculous claims.
>>>
>>> > Hell, even with court released evidence, you would
>>> > find SOME way to make the "proof" inconsequential.
>>>
>>> According to Rex all of this information was "sealed by the courts" yet
>>> somehow Rex is the only man in America who knows the contents of the
>>> sealed
>>> files.
>>>
>>> >I really like the harping you were doing against Rex a few days ago.
>>>
>>> It's not just a few days ago. I jump on that liar every time he opens
>>> his
>>> pie-hole.
>>>
>>> >Remember? You had no problem with the vile, petty, disgusting, or
>>> >illegal things Microsoft has done to their partners, customers,
>>> >competitors, or the community at large. Your whining was that
>>> >internal communications made public by the court is not a public
>>> >admission. "How much can you pervert the truth without actually
>>> >lying?"
>>>
>>> Let's start with Rex's fable of how the "Vista EULA gives Microsoft the
>>> right to access *ANY* file on your computer for *ANY* reason at all."
>>>
>>> Talk about perverting the truth. Do backup Rex on that idiotic lie and
>>> tell
>>> me how you actually believe this nonsense.
>>>
>>> >Wow! How much more like Scientology can Microsoft get?
>>>
>>> How much more Kool-Aide can the zealots in the Linux cult drink?
>>>
>>> >> > This of course is a problem because most people who use other
>>> >> > browsers
>>> >> > use them because they don't want Active X invading their PCs all
>>> >> > the
>>> >> > time.
>>>
>>> >> The real problem is that you post your random hallucinations here as
>>> >> "facts."
>>>
>>> >You are very good, Ezekiel. How much does MS pay you to go slogging
>>> >through the slums of the internet? A goon of your quality should get
>>> >a raise.
>>>
>>> Another idiot who thinks that people are paid to post to some obscure
>>> "slum"
>>> newsgroup that few actually read.
>>
>> No. Just you. I took a quick look at your recent posting history ...
>> very impressive. You spend a startling amount of time interacting
>> with people you despise. If you aren't getting paid for this, you
>> have a serious personality problem ... and you are a sucker as well.
>>
>> You are way too good to do this for free. DFS and Hadron are pikers
>> compared to you. The way you made Richard Rasker look so stupid
>> because his wife's college uses floppies and off-line computers for
>> tests was absolutely beautiful. Richard has no authority at the
>> college, no knowledge of how the classes operate, or why. Yet you
>> made him look like an ignorant fool. Effectively blaming a passer by
>> for unrelated complex problems takes real talent, Ezekiel. You should
>> be getting paid to be here.
>>
>> I notice you did not deny getting paid, why not? This is usenet.
>> There is no penalty for lying here, it won't matter if you lie or tell
>> the truth.
>
> Scott Douglas (aka Scott Nudds, VistaKing, Ezekiel and dozens more)
I've never posted under any of those names in any forum. Prove that I have
you lying scumbag.
> has posted here for many years.
No I haven't. Prove that I have you lying scumbag.
> At the heights of his career he repeatedly called for the
> slitting of throats of Linux users.
I have *NEVER* done anything of the sorts. Prove it you lying scumbag.
> Scott "Ezekiel" Douglas will be better served in a nuthouse. That's why I
> killfiled him and never interact with the creature.
Nobody gives a crap what a lying scumbag like Roy Schestowitz does.
|
|
