Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>> In article <Xg3il.511$Qc.368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris
>> Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> It doesn't sound like Roy's posting style at all, though.
>> It's signed with Roy's PGP key.
> So what?
> Well, I know now that Roy sent it. But the PGP key means nothing.
> Just about every part of a post can be faked, with the right ISP.
>From your post:
OpenPGP Security Info
Error - signature verification failed
gpg command line and output:
/usr/bin/gpg --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 -d
gpg: Signature made Tue 03 Feb 2009 22:40:40 GMT using DSA key ID 74572E8E
gpg: BAD signature from "Roy Schestowitz <sch[AT]danielsorogon.com>"
> I don't like what Roy did; it sounded out-of-character. I hope it is
> just an aberration. We'll see.
It's quite understandable considering the harassment he's suffered from
| "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It
| is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." ~ William
| Pitt the Younger
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 22.214.171.124-60.fc8
06:39:54 up 91 days, 14:22, 5 users, load average: 0.00, 0.05, 0.03