The post is definetely from Roy Schestowitz. He exposed the Flatfish
scum for what shit it is.
This was also posted on the boycottnovell.com.
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/04/irc-log-03022009-3/
schestowitz I exposed the flatfish today Feb 03 23:12
schestowitz An old friend of him apprently dislikes him enough to
pursue this. Feb 03 23:12
The bastard Flatfish deserves everything he has coming his way.
On Feb 4, 1:06 pm, Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <REfil.776$MK6....@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > >> Well, I know now that Roy sent it. But the PGP key means nothing.
>
> > >> Just about every part of a post can be faked, with the right ISP.
>
> > > You can't fake someone's PGP signature without access to their private
> > > key, even with the right ISP, as the ISP doesn't have access to the
> > > private key.
>
> > What did you see in my post?
>
> A GPG signature that I didn't bother to check.
>
>
>
> > How many times have you bothered to verify the signing in any COLA newsgroup
> > message?
>
> Twice. First time was yesterday, when I read Roy's post, concluded it was
> an obvious fake, but then couldn't see anything wrong in the headers.
>
> Second time was just now, when I checked the one in your post a couple back,
> and got this:
>
> gpg: Signature made Tue Feb 3 14:40:40 2009 PST using DSA key ID 74572E8E
> gpg: BAD signature from "Roy Schestowitz <s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
>
> --
> --Tim Smith
|
|
