-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Homer on Wednesday 28 January 2009 23:42 : \____
>
>
> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>
>> Remote access is nice and a must for many scenarios but just imagine
>> accessing your 10TB at 2MB/s or worse *all the time*. That would be
>> ... not nice!
>
> That's Google's flawed scenario, which I agree is totally impractical.
>
> My biggest concern would be that my private data, however large or
> small, was being stored on a server subject to arbitrary search and
> seizure by the US government, without probably cause, warrant, or even
> so much as an explanation:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Letter
>
> No thanks. I'll just keep my private data at /home/, if it's all the same.
If you insist on keeping your data at home, then you must be a child-molesting
terrorist. And if you have a problem with NSA snoops, then you
are "anti-American".
- --
~~ Best of wishes
"If you can’t make it good, at least make it look good."
--Bill Gates, Microsoft
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmBCpkACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6eYACfeibzq70SuFTjEos92W7zze+X
tg8AnifGg5v/cUuJB6yhBeqaQMyJvT4b
=rDA7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
