-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ JEDIDIAH on Tuesday 30 June 2009 19:18 : \____
> On 2009-06-30, Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In article <2073880.qzqp1eWA4t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> They can look the same, but under the hood GNU/Linux is more powerful.
>> How so?
> ...there is a certain point there. OTOH, if you end up turning a Mac into
> little more than yet another Linux then what's the point really of bothering
> with MacOS to begin with?
> Inferior system management?
> Inferior driver support?
> Inferior support for non-Apple/non-MS data?
> Jobs of Borg style datafile management?
> The fact that Photoshop does CYMK well is far more meaningful to those
> that need that sort of thing than the trivial bits of minutia.
And Photoshop runs on Linux with Wine. How well can Mac OS X run Windows
programs without a Windows licence? (I know PS has a Mac version)
~~ Best of wishes
Fachbegriffe der Informatik, Push:
Das Notebook mit der flachen Hand vom Tisch schlagen.
- -- http://www-605.ibm.com/misc_includes/en_SG/drop_test.pdf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----