On 2009-06-30, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ____/ JEDIDIAH on Tuesday 30 June 2009 19:18 : \____
>
>> On 2009-06-30, Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> In article <2073880.qzqp1eWA4t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> They can look the same, but under the hood GNU/Linux is more powerful.
>>>
>>> How so?
>>
>> ...there is a certain point there. OTOH, if you end up turning a Mac into
>> little more than yet another Linux then what's the point really of bothering
>> with MacOS to begin with?
>>
>> Inferior system management?
>> Inferior driver support?
>> Inferior support for non-Apple/non-MS data?
>> Jobs of Borg style datafile management?
>>
>> The fact that Photoshop does CYMK well is far more meaningful to those
>> that need that sort of thing than the trivial bits of minutia.
>
> And Photoshop runs on Linux with Wine. How well can Mac OS X run Windows
> programs without a Windows licence? (I know PS has a Mac version)
Wine runs on MacOS now actually.
You can buy yourself a boxed copy of Crossover for MacOS at Best Buy.
[deletia]
--
MSOffice is completely unremarkable except for the fact |||
that it is most compatable with itself. / | \
|
|
