Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:56:15 +0200, Mart van de Wege wrote:
>
>>>> Did you think we would forget that? The author of the neowin article
>>>> sure does, as he is conflating MSOXML 2007 with OOXML.
>>>
>>> Stop being a pedantic twit.
>>
>> What's pedantic about saying that MS Office 2007 does not comply with
>> ISO OOXML? Are you saying it does, then?
>
> First, you didn't say ISO OOXML, as Office fully conforms to Ecma OOXML.
>
> Second, I'm saying that the "conformance" issues are so minor as to not
> affect compatibility.
Which means, because you say it, absolutely nothing. So one can safely
assume that there are giant issues, and compatibility is only minor
> Certainly, Office 2007 is far more compatible
> with ISO OOXML than most ODF apps are with ODF 1.2.
Nice. So you attempt to introduce a *new* standard definition which is not
yet approved.
And then complain that not all ODF apps have been "upgraded" to a standard
which is "all shiny, brand new"
>> And BTW, when are we getting a link to that royalty-free patent license
>> for C#/CLI?
>
> I've told you this already.
No, you have not. You tried your usual weasel wording
--
Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together.
|
|
