On 2009-03-30, Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Doctor Smith <iaintgotnostinkinemail@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:11:47 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, JEDIDIAH belched out
>>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>> On 2009-03-30, Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither do I. I do disagree with the AMOUNT that are actively "pushed"
>>>>> by distro watch. I keep asking the freetards : what does YOUR distro for
>>>>> your desktop provide that I can not emulate with ten minutes synaptic
>>>>> work on Debian? I am yet to get a reply to this simple question.
>>>>
>>>> Avoiding all of your stupid desktop centric complaints.
>>>>
>>>> [deletia]
>>>
>>> You should [deletia] sooner. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who pulls the
>>> "freetard" card might as well be a Microsoft operative.
>>
>> So how many of you in COLA have contributed to the OSS movement?
>> Where is the code?
>
> If you notice the freetards still have not answered my question. Why?
...because RMS doesn't even require it and he's the biggest strawman
you could possibly come up with. It's a red herring to distract from
the obvious:
A little labor in any creative endeavor goes a long way. That's why
turning it into a cash cow for the lopsided benefit of the few to the
detriment of the rest of the planet makes little sense.
[deletia]
...not that you are in any position to judge anyways.
--
The social cost of suing/prosecuting individuals |||
for non-commercial copyright infringement far outweighs / | \
the social value of copyright to begin with.
|
|
