On 2009-03-30, Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Doctor Smith <iaintgotnostinkinemail@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:11:47 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, JEDIDIAH belched out
>>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>>> On 2009-03-30, Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Neither do I. I do disagree with the AMOUNT that are actively "pushed"
>>>>> by distro watch. I keep asking the freetards : what does YOUR distro for
>>>>> your desktop provide that I can not emulate with ten minutes synaptic
>>>>> work on Debian? I am yet to get a reply to this simple question.
>>>> Avoiding all of your stupid desktop centric complaints.
>>> You should [deletia] sooner. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who pulls the
>>> "freetard" card might as well be a Microsoft operative.
>> So how many of you in COLA have contributed to the OSS movement?
>> Where is the code?
> If you notice the freetards still have not answered my question. Why?
...because RMS doesn't even require it and he's the biggest strawman
you could possibly come up with. It's a red herring to distract from
A little labor in any creative endeavor goes a long way. That's why
turning it into a cash cow for the lopsided benefit of the few to the
detriment of the rest of the planet makes little sense.
...not that you are in any position to judge anyways.
The social cost of suing/prosecuting individuals |||
for non-commercial copyright infringement far outweighs / | \
the social value of copyright to begin with.