Sinister Midget wrote:
> On 2009-05-26, Andrew Halliwell <spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> ____/ nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tuesday 26 May 2009 12:57 : \____
>>>
>>>> Q: Do you remember that in January, 1996, a lot of OEMs were bundling
>>>> non-Microsoft browsers?
>>>> A: I'm not sure.
>>> It's a lawyer family. They know how to lie with a straight face.
>> Lie, or come across like the less intelligent twin of george w bush?
>> I remember reading that years ago... it continued...
>> A lot longer than that, with the poor lawyer (poor lawyer? Are you insane!?)
>> trying to explain what concerned meant and STILL not getting anywhere.
>
> That's why cameras should be required in court rooms in any case not
> involving secrets that could damage security.
>
> If people had seen him weasel and look stupid, only Wintards of the
> caliber that can be found hanging around in this group would still
> worship him. All the rest would have started looking elsewhere. They'd
> understand perfectly why their crapware crumbles very frequently with
> no more coaxing than opening the browser.
Unfortunately here is only a small fragment of a film:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qNVe024RvI&feature=related
Here is the documentary "Download: the true story of the Internet -
Browser wars".
http://tinyurl.com/rbdmcf
It's obvious that Gates is lying.
Anyway his brainwashed faithful lot will defend the hypocrite, no mater
what.
--
|_|0|_| Marti van Lin
|_|_|0| http://ml2mst.googlepages.com
|0|0|0| http://osgeex.blogspot.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|
|
