Hadron wrote:
> Peter KÃhlmann <peter-koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> In article <slrnh759r2.bt2.ZekeGregory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>> Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2009-07-30, Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> > In article <7ua9k6-nrb.ln1@xxxxxxxxxx>, Homer <usenet@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> http://jonreagan.wordpress.com/about/
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Another naive pragmatist.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Is there some particular reason people shouldn't be allowed to
>>>>> >> criticise morally bankrupt companies like Microsoft, and their
>>>>> >> equally morally deficient supporters?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Criticize? Yes. Repeatedly lie and make unbacked accusations? No.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, you agree that Quark should be sanctioned for lying about linux
>>>>> advocates?
>>>>
>>>> No one should repeatedly lie. Do you agree Schestowitz should stop
>>>> repeatedly lying and making unbacked accusations?
>>>
>>> Or should Ahlstrom stop lying about Moshe laughing about Peter's dad
>>> being seriously ill? That was the bottom of the barrel even for him.
>>>
>>
>> Except that flatfish did so. He later tried some sort of apology for
>> his extremely bad manners.
>> But that does not change the fact that flatfish was in asshole mode
>> first.
>
> Wow. You are a cretin recently. You know exactly what happened.
Yes, I know. I answered flatfishs first asshole post after I talked about
my father being ill. That is *one* of the reasons I know what happened.
Another one is that I am able to read.
--
Warning: 10 days have passed since your last Windows reinstall.
|
|
