On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:11:40 +0200, Hadron wrote:
> Rick <none@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:39 +0200, Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> Rick <none@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:40:26 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <lpqdnSaNgsPBjRbXnZ2dnUVZ_gZi4p2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>> Rick <none@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:01:16 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > http://verofakto.blogspot.com/2009/08/analysis-of-boycottnovell-
>> spam-
>>>>>> problem.html
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Pay particular attention to the volume of posts and the number of
>>>>>> > different places these are being spammed to and tell us how this
>>>>>> > is being done manually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does it matter if it isn't manual?
>>>>>
>>>>> If it is not manual, it violates the TOS at many of the sites it is
>>>>> being spewed to.
>>>>
>>>> If the TOS are being violated in such a public manner, why are those
>>>> sites' administrators doing anything? And why does it bother you and
>>>> flatfish so much?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> If it *is* manual, then it raises the question of who is paying for
>>>>> it, for as Roy himself noted, people don't spend that much time
>>>>> posting for free.
>>>>
>>>> What does it matter who is paying for it?
>>>
>>> Difficult I know Rick, but lets pretend you buy ONE ticket to go to
>>> the cinema. The cinema is half empty. How you feel if Roy and HPT
>>> tagged along on your ticket?
>>>
>>> Hard for you to imagine. But do TRY to think. Thinking is SO
>>> important.
>>
>> Fine, fine... what does it matter to flatfish, Tim Smith, or even you
>> who is paying...
>
> They disapprove of thieves and freeloaders?
who has proved Roy to be a thief? As for "freeloaders", it seems many
people here don't like anyone taking advantage of anything that doesn't
require payment.
--
Rick
|
|
