On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:39 +0200, Hadron wrote:
> Rick <none@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:40:26 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>> In article <lpqdnSaNgsPBjRbXnZ2dnUVZ_gZi4p2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> Rick <none@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:01:16 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > http://verofakto.blogspot.com/2009/08/analysis-of-boycottnovell-
spam-
>>>> problem.html
>>>> >
>>>> > Pay particular attention to the volume of posts and the number of
>>>> > different places these are being spammed to and tell us how this is
>>>> > being done manually.
>>>>
>>>> What does it matter if it isn't manual?
>>>
>>> If it is not manual, it violates the TOS at many of the sites it is
>>> being spewed to.
>>
>> If the TOS are being violated in such a public manner, why are those
>> sites' administrators doing anything? And why does it bother you and
>> flatfish so much?
>>
>>
>>> If it *is* manual, then it raises the question of who is paying for
>>> it, for as Roy himself noted, people don't spend that much time
>>> posting for free.
>>
>> What does it matter who is paying for it?
>
> Difficult I know Rick, but lets pretend you buy ONE ticket to go to the
> cinema. The cinema is half empty. How you feel if Roy and HPT tagged
> along on your ticket?
>
> Hard for you to imagine. But do TRY to think. Thinking is SO important.
Fine, fine... what does it matter to flatfish, Tim Smith, or even you who
is paying...
--
Rick
|
|
