On 2009-08-21, Ezekiel <zeke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> "RonB" <ronb02NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:h6kop0$q5h$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Black Dragon wrote:
>>> Homer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Microsoft Microsoft's CEO Microsoft's Microsoft's Microsoft's
>>>> Microsoft Microsoft Microsoft Microsoft Microsoft Microsoft Microsoft
>>>> Microsoft
>>>
>>>> obsession obsessions
>>>
>>> Indeed.
>>>
>>> It has been said before and it'll be said again, this isn't a Linux
>>> advocacy group (anymore, all the true Linux advocates left here a long
>>> time ago), it's a Microsoft hate group.
>>
>> You keep repeating the same lie, but it doesn't make it the truth.
>> Comparing the superiority of Linux to the inferiority of Windows *is*
>> Linux Advocacy.
>
>
> What threads alledgely "compare" these two operating systems? What I
> generally see is a bunch of whining over things that have nothing to do
> with the operating systems themselves.
...a subtle sort of lie.
While it's true that Microsoft's biggest problems these days are infact
in userspace, the fact remains that Microsoft's biggest problems are
Microsoft's own code.
The OS vendor is still the problem.
>
>
>> I would love for the WinTrolls to leave COLA so we could talk about the
>> superiority of Linux, but that's not likely to happen, is it?
>
> If true then you shouldn't have a problem showing where you "advocates" are
> actually comparing operating systems and not whining about emails that
> someone sent Bill Gates back in 1992.
Yeah... because it doesn't really matter that the people trying to
fix yesterday's mistakes are the people that made those mistakes to begin
with.
--
Oracle... can't live with it... |||
/ | \
can't just replace it with postgres...
|
|
