Micoshaft Appil asstroturfing fraudster pounding the sock Moshe Goldfarb
wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Appil Department of Marketing:
>> All Linux needs is a good commercial
>
> Didn't work for Microsoft.
> Won't work for Linux.
>
> What Linux needs is less zealots and more contributors.
Thats you with your ritual anti-Linux asstroturfing again to support
micosahft anti-Linux marketing position.
Micoshaft names RHAT and Canonical (Ubuntu) as teh enemy!!!
---------------------------------------------------------------
BEAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
They got nothin better to do?
I'm thinking about that RHAT advert...
First they laugh at us
Then they fight us
Then we win
So we are now at stage 2 where micoshaft is picking a fight
by naming RHAT and Canonical (Ubuntu) as their enemies.
A few days earlier they named Intel and HP as enemies too.
And Google? - yet another enemy that has destroyed
a large chunk of micoshaft already.
Looks like micoshaft is catching its death from all around.
And only a few days ago micoshaft's Balmer claimed micoshaft
has been fighting Linux for YEARS!!!!
Thats despite all the trolls.
Verbosity makes things unclear.
Either Balmer is lying, or the windummy trolls are lying
or both are liars as Linux continues its meteoric rise
and micoshaft revenue heads south.
Windummy paytard loons all thrown into the trollard soup after
years of lying about Micoshaft claiming it doesn't care about
Linux or that Linux is too insignificant when it was
the exact opposite.
As micoshaft sales have lost 30% of market.
how does micoshaft define competing with Linux?
It can't be anything serious.
All we see here are a bunch of windummy trolls ranting
anti-Linux slogans.
Is that what micoshaft calls competing with Linux?
Is that how they lost 30% market share to Linux?
I am sure all reporters, journalists, bloggers,
Linux engineers, and big bosses of big companies
would all like to know now what Balmer meant by
competing with Linux. Please define.
|
|
