Hadron wrote:
> Terry Porter <linux-2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:08:33 +0000, ray wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:42:57 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:40:41 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> "Wow, Microsoft canceled a Stallman conference in Argentina"
>>>>
>>>>> Cancel the talk by Richard Stallman in Mar del Plata UTN.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The local board of health probably closed down the show after they took
>>>> a look at Stallman picking his toes and eating the dead skin.
>>>
>>> Why would that be? Your continued presence shows it's not a health risk.
>>
>> Hahahahah!
>
>
> Err, that's not even the slightest but funny.
(bit)
So, then please tell me what's so funny about mr. Goldfarb's original reply,
that you didn't feel the need to react to that?
Anyway, I think it would be a very serious matter if one of the most
influential (albeit controversial) computer experts in the world can't hold
a speech in a public institution, because a commercial entity basically
says that nobody using their products is allowed to say bad things about
them, or give someone else the opportunity to do so.
Richard Rasker
--
http://www.linetec.nl
|
|
