-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ TomB on Tuesday 08 Sep 2009 22:15 : \____
> On 2009-09-08, the following emerged from the brain of Peter KÃhlmann:
>> Well, the idea was to put config data into a SQL database.
>> And, and this is real important, to have the choice to retain the file
>> config scheme KDE now has or use the database scheme.
>>
>> Again that "choice thingy" Hadron Snot Quark is so afraid of
>
> In a way it makes sense to put KDE's config in a database; after all
> it is a graphical environment, so most users will configure it through
> the graphical interfaces anyway. As long as this approach doesn't
> spread to actual system configuration I'm happy. I *don't* want to
> configure my web server though SQL queries :-p
Amarok uses databases too. JOINs must be faster that way... than many human-
readable text files. Are desktop settings so massive that they need a database?
- --
~~ Best of wishes
I just hate to be pushed around by some fucking machine.
- -- Ken Thompson
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
03:05:02 up 2 days, 3:14, 2 users, load average: 0.40, 0.47, 0.54
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqnDoEACgkQU4xAY3RXLo57iACdEZuIsCkh2/b+7jnUDkAQYcRu
atUAn3MKHSrr1ur91YqlDVdgBzSM0Zlj
=Czwx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
