Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Stallman Explains What CodePlex Really Is....

  • Subject: Stallman Explains What CodePlex Really Is....
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:02:20 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Many in our community are suspicious of the CodePlex Foundation. With its board 
of directors dominated by Microsoft employees and ex-employees, plus apologist 
Miguel de Icaza, there is plenty of reason to be wary of the organization. But 
that doesn't prove its actions will be bad.

[...]

"This foundation is not the first Microsoft project to bear the name "CodePlex". 
There is also codeplex.com, a project hosting site, whose list of allowed 
licenses excludes GNU GPL version 3. Perhaps this reflects the fact that GPL 
version 3 is designed to protect a program's free software status from being 
subverted by Microsoft's patents through deals like the Novell-Microsoft pact. 
We don't know that the CodePlex Foundation will try to discourage GPL version 3, 
but it would fit Microsoft's pattern.

"The term "commercial software companies" embodies a peculiar confusion. Every 
business is by definition commercial, so all software developed by a business--
whether free or proprietary--is automatically commercial software. But there is 
a widespread public confusion between "commercial software" and "proprietary 
software"

[...]

"Perhaps the aim of CodePlex is to suborn free software application developers 
into making Windows their main platform. Many of the projects hosted now on 
codeplex.com are add-ons for proprietary software. 

[...]

"However good or bad the CodePlex Foundation's actions, we must not accept them 
as an excuse for Microsoft's acts of aggression against our community. From its 
recent attempt to sell patents to proxy trolls who could then do dirty work 
against GNU/Linux to its longstanding promotion of Digital Restrictions 
Management, Microsoft continues to act to harm us. We would be fools indeed to 
let anything distract us from that."

http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/microsoft-codeplex-foundation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrKbO0ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4bGQCfYWutrUFd2B+8jBS1YYWh3L8Q
cLIAn0H3bpvmmn1bOOU57hKgdw9MQxnI
=uyx8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index