Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Stallman Explains What CodePlex Really Is....

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ 7 on Tuesday 06 Oct 2009 21:51 : \____

> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> "Many in our community are suspicious of the CodePlex Foundation. With its
>> board of directors dominated by Microsoft employees and ex-employees, plus
>> apologist Miguel de Icaza, there is plenty of reason to be wary of the
>> organization. But that doesn't prove its actions will be bad.
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> "This foundation is not the first Microsoft project to bear the name
>> "CodePlex". There is also codeplex.com, a project hosting site, whose list
>> of allowed licenses excludes GNU GPL version 3. Perhaps this reflects the
>> fact that GPL version 3 is designed to protect a program's free software
>> status from being subverted by Microsoft's patents through deals like the
>> Novell-Microsoft pact. We don't know that the CodePlex Foundation will try
>> to discourage GPL version 3, but it would fit Microsoft's pattern.
>> 
>> "The term "commercial software companies" embodies a peculiar confusion.
>> Every business is by definition commercial, so all software developed by a
>> business-- whether free or proprietary--is automatically commercial
>> software. But there is a widespread public confusion between "commercial
>> software" and "proprietary software"
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> "Perhaps the aim of CodePlex is to suborn free software application
>> developers into making Windows their main platform. Many of the projects
>> hosted now on codeplex.com are add-ons for proprietary software.
> 
> 
> The purpose of codeplex is to be as stubborn as possible
> to resist wide spread adoption of GPL3.
> 
> 
> More businesses and projects adopting GPL3 making it stronger
> in the commercial market and once again the purpose
> of codeplex licensing is to stubbornly force
> businesses away from adopting GPL by promising
> micoshaft ropey crap x in exchange for
> ???
> future profit!
> 
> It is not enough that micoshaft will get killed by GPL3
> but they want to drag down with them as many businesses
> as they can when they go down by denying them all the
> benefits of early GPL3 adoption and vast sea of software
> and resources open source offers that micoshaft ropey
> code CAN NEVER offer.
> 
> That is the purpose of codeplex crap.
> 
> The purpose of codeplex is to lie and lie and lie
> with anti-GPL rhetoric to businesses until they drop dread.

You mean "dead"?

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes


That's like building a fire escape out of balsa-wood and painting it with
thermite. -- Peter da Silva on writing scripts in csh
http://Schestowitz.com  |    RHAT Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
 22:05:01 up 3 days, 21:17,  2 users,  load average: 0.84, 0.77, 0.65
      http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrLsaUACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6VtgCfXN1qYMbNPFWyKv4fUXXk/tFd
WeMAoKWWUryMIDTXeda9m3aYM9gPe/Iv
=xjJZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index