Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Win Against SLAPP-Type Censorship, Loss in Italy and Vimeo

  • Subject: [News] Win Against SLAPP-Type Censorship, Loss in Italy and Vimeo
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:58:21 +0000
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The Need for H.R. 4364

,----[ Quote ]
| Yesterday, Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), 
| introduced H.R. 4364, the Citizen 
| Participation Act of 2009. The Citizen 
| Participation Act encourages civic engagement 
| and protects against meritless lawsuits 
| brought against those who petition the 
| government or speak out on a public issue. 
| The bill allows someone who is brought to 
| court on a meritless lawsuit arising from his 
| exercise of First Amendment rights to have 
| the lawsuit dismissed, and to recover 
| attorney's fees.
| 
| With so much happening these days: 
| Afghanistan, Guantanamo, Health Care, Jobs, 
| the Climate, and other big happenings in the 
| First Amendment world, including libel 
| tourism and reporter's shield legislation, 
| you might wonder why so much ado about some 
| meritless lawsuits.
`----

http://www.anti-slapp.org/?q=node/71

Italian Courts, latest score: Berlusconi 1; YouTube 0 

,----[ Quote ]
| The Italian court today struck a significant 
| blow in favour of Mediaset, the broadcaster 
| controlled by Silvio Berlusconi, and against 
| YouTube.
| 
| [...]
| 
| No doubt lawyers in other jurisdictions are 
| already sharpening their writs in pursuit of 
| YouTube - in the meantime, the Viacom v 
| YouTube litigation continues to wend its way 
| through the New York courts, with no sign of 
| an imminent conclusion.
`----

http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/2009/12/italian-courts-latest-score-berlusconi.html

Why you will regret using Vimeo.

,----[ Quote ]
| The email read as follows:
| 
|     We see that you are using Vimeo for 
|     uploading commercial content.
| 
|     Weâre sorry, but as stated in our Terms 
|     and Conditions of Use, on
|     our Community Guidelines page, and on the 
|     upload page itself, Vimeo is for 
|     noncommercial use only, and we cannot 
|     host this content for you. Please take 24 
|     hours to move your videos to another 
|     hosting service.
| 
| My immediate reaction was disbelief. After 
| all I had read their guidelines which state:
| 
|     You may not upload commercials, 
|     infomercials, or demos that actively sell 
|     or promote a product or service.
| 
| I didnât believe any of my videos fell into 
| this category. 
`----

http://boagworld.com/reviews/vimeo


Recent:

China Imposes New Internet Controls

,----[ Quote ]
| Chinaâs government censors have taken fresh
| aim at the Internet, rolling out new
| measures that limit its citizensâ ability
| to set up personal Web sites and to view
| hundreds of Web sites offering films, video
| games and other forms of entertainment.
`----

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/world/asia/18china.html?_r=3&ref=world


Point Out A Potential Photoshopping Of A Demi Moore Picture,
And She Has Her Lawyers Send Out The Nastygrams

,----[ Quote ]
| Apparently Demi Moore and her lawyers
| missed that whole story. Back in November
| some folks noticed what appeared to be a
| photoshopping of Demi Moore's left hip on
| the cover of W magazine. There was some
| debate over it, but either way, people
| moved on and it was forgotten. Not so fast!
| While there was some discussion about it --
| and Moore herself chimed in on Twitter to
| claim that the photo was not altered --
| she's now had her lawyers threaten at least
| two publications over the original story.
| Their claim is that the posts are
| defamatory. Even if there was no retouching
| of the photo, it's hard to see what is
| possibly "defamatory" in the story. Digital
| retouching happens all the time, and
| claiming that a photo was retouched, if
| anything, would implicate the photographers
| or graphic artists at W, not Moore. There's
| simply nothing even close to defamatory in
| regards to Moore herself.
`----

http://techdirt.com/articles/20091221/1701497452.shtml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAks1X60ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5e/gCfYS5LpeZaA33L/R9nBR2WxOWG
gKUAoIAnrm8MJE98eXWzo/p4XNpAIXKZ
=afOi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index