-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Lusotec on Tuesday 05 Jan 2010 11:25 : \____
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> Intel's compiler cripples code on AMD and VIA chips
>> (...)
>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1567108/intel-compiler-cripples-
>> code-amd-via-chips
>
> ICC compiled executables have always performed much better on Intel CPU when
> compared to AMD CPUs. If Intel intentionally cripples ICC when targeting AMD
> CPU then they only hurt ICC.
>
> Regards.
>
> p.s. When I last locked at downloading ICC version 11, the tar ball was 1GiB
> in size. What can possible justify that size? Do they include an entire OS
> in there or what?!
The question is, was this deliberate? Microsoft deliberately used APIs that hurt competitors.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Didn't bother to check the brand of disks -- with IDE, that's like attempting
to differenetiate between a Yugo and a Trabi. -- Brad Ackerman
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
roy pts/0 :0 Sat Jan 2 01:35 still logged in
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAktDap0ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4OPQCfdhmcYF7kfzXUwRf3j8RyPSQ1
yxMAn32iJOqXt72J5kCl0wSLzoT84mg4
=oz5L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
