Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Microsoft loose another 100 - 300 THOUSAND exchange seats.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ High Plains Thumper on Monday 18 Jan 2010 15:57 : \____

> Mark Kent wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper espoused:
>>
>>> I found a similar article at:
>>>
>>> http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2010/01/14/panasonic_ibm_lotuslive_contract/
>>>
>>> It is about time.  I don't know of too many admins who are fond of
>>> Exchange.  Some decry the day their company dropped Unix mail server
>>> for Exchange.  And for a good reason.
>>
>> How the world turns around - now IBM are the good guys :-)
> 
> I guess it takes a monopoly to overcome a monopoly.  :-)

Not when it comes to software patents.

> Companies are looking to trim costs to remain competitive.  Problem is
> IMO, managing a Microsoft based infrastructure is more costly than
> internal cloud computing infrastructure and diskless Internet terminals,
> terminals which are basically plug-n-play.  (One craps out, replace the
> terminal, switch on, back in business.)
> 
> All software resides on the servers, which is much easier to manage.

Harder.

For the user, that is. 

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes

http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer |  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 22.6%us,  5.0%sy,  0.1%ni, 70.6%id,  1.3%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.4%si,  0.0%st
      http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktVMvsACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7qOQCffj7boAopcGtkeczW26dHj8TK
znUAoJNlEXsrlD1wVzgT3JGbysnVbsGj
=p64G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index