Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] OpenOffice.org Compared to Microsoft's Fat Office

Hash: SHA1

____/ JeffM on Monday 15 Feb 2010 04:49 : \____

>>JeffM wrote:
>>>He compared OpenOffice.org 3.1.1 and Microsoft Office 2007.
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>A lot of people interact with Web forms now.
>>I hear that Oracle plans to integrate OOo
>>more closely with the Web.
> I've mentioned before that the "HTML" that OOo produces
> doesn't pass muster with the W3C Validator
> --even when fed a compliant file
> and simply asked to save it again.  8-(
> Maybe Step 1 will be to clean that up.
>>It has a good base to build upon
> I'm assuming that means Oracle.[1]
>>(it also has MySQL).
> Well, that would be a good excuse not the knife that baby.
> [1]...and not OOo Base.
> That Java-based thing OOo uses for DBs
> has gotten a lot of scowls over the years.

I don't think Oracle wants to knife any baby, just use that baby to upsell.

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes

There's all kinds of things that can be done to improve FTP but the
single best would be to shoot it and shovel dirt over it." -- M. J. Ranum
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 140 total,   1 running, 139 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index