<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>schestowitz.com &#187; Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/category/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog</link>
	<description>Reflections on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 18:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why James Wilson Dislikes Mark Lewis</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/16/why-james-wilson-dislikes-mark-lewis/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/16/why-james-wilson-dislikes-mark-lewis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 04:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=10281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Wilson is upset not because Lewis is &#8220;rogue&#8221; but because Lewis knew how to handle Wilson he more I read into the tweetfests (or &#8220;storms&#8221;) of Wilson, the clearer it seems to me that Wilson&#8217;s obsession with Lewis is due to hurt. Yes, Lewis really hurt him. In a nutshell, and in chronological order: [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>James Wilson is upset <u>not</u> because Lewis is &#8220;rogue&#8221; but because Lewis knew how to handle Wilson</em></p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/t.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="T" />he more I read into the tweetfests (or &#8220;storms&#8221;) of Wilson, the clearer it seems to me that Wilson&#8217;s obsession with Lewis is due to <b>hurt</b>.</p>
<p>Yes, Lewis really hurt him.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, and in chronological order:</p>
<ul>
<li>Wilson said some darn things</li>
<li>These darn things led to backlash</li>
<li>Wilson threatened to sue over those bouts of backlash (over the above-mentioned darn things)</li>
<li>Wilson filed a lawsuit he can barely afford against people who had insufficient assets to cover his legal bills</li>
<li>Wilson soon realised he would not manage to settle the matter</li>
<li>Wilson spent all his money trying to &#8220;win&#8221; the case (a pyrrhic victory)</li>
<li>Wilson &#8220;won&#8221; but received nothing (could not and still cannot even recover the money he lost in litigation)</li>
<li>Wilson now protests against the solicitor and barrister, as a distraction from the fact his lawsuit was redundant, misconceived, and fruitless</li>
</ul>
<p>Sounds familiar, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/16/why-james-wilson-dislikes-mark-lewis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Every Former US President Looks OK Compared to Cheeto</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/15/every-former-us-president-looks-ok-compared-to-cheeto/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/15/every-former-us-president-looks-ok-compared-to-cheeto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 14:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=10267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama was no hero he former US President Barack Obama is probably across the road from us right now, as he&#8217;s talking there in a few hours. I have mixed feelings. He did many bad things. Only relative to the current President is he a &#8220;good&#8221; person.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Barack Obama was no hero</em></p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/t.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="T" /> he former US President Barack Obama is <a href="https://www.cooplive.com/events/president-barack-obama-nj9f">probably across the road from us right now</a>, as he&#8217;s talking there in a few hours.</p>
<p>I have mixed feelings.</p>
<p>He did many bad things.</p>
<p>Only relative to the current President is he a &#8220;good&#8221; person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/15/every-former-us-president-looks-ok-compared-to-cheeto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dictator Can Make Obama US President Again</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/13/dictator-can-make-obama-us-president-again/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/13/dictator-can-make-obama-us-president-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=10240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.&#8221; &#8212; George Bernard Shaw he (former) President Barack Obama will be here this week to give a talk. Across the road from us. I have had many bad things to say about him (the drone strikes, NSA spy programs etc.), but he [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.&#8221;</em> &#8212; George Bernard Shaw</p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/t.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="T" />he (former) President Barack Obama will be <a href="https://www.cooplive.com/events/president-barack-obama-nj9f">here this week to give a talk</a>. <b>Across the road from us</b>.</p>
<p>I have had many bad things to say about him (the drone strikes, NSA spy programs etc.), but he was nowhere as bad as the mobster who came after him.</p>
<p>One thing I liked about Obama&#8217;s attitude is that he didn&#8217;t fall for bait from Faux Noise (Fox News), e.g. heckling over the colour of his jacket.</p>
<p>Obama was &#8220;smooth&#8221; enough not to be easily provoked, not even by Putin.</p>
<p>The current demented dictator is like a marionette with temper and attitude.</p>
<p>If the current dictator changes the rules to end a two-term limit, then Obama can become a US President again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/13/dictator-can-make-obama-us-president-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ManCity Back on Topic (Football)</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/13/mancity-back-on-topic-football/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/13/mancity-back-on-topic-football/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 02:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=10217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow oday we expect to see some tourists from France around here, as there&#8217;s a big opportunity for ManCity to show that it&#8217;s better than the two-times (in a row) champions of Europe, PSG. It&#8217;s going to be partly sunny today and tomorrow. This coming weekend we&#8217;ll need to do further testing of new improvements [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Tomorrow</em></p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/psg-today.jpg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/psg-today.jpg" alt="PSG today" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10218" /></a></p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/t.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="T" />oday we expect to see some tourists from France around here, as there&#8217;s a big opportunity for ManCity to show that it&#8217;s better than the two-times (in a row) champions of Europe, PSG.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be partly sunny today and tomorrow.</p>
<p>This coming weekend we&#8217;ll need to do further testing of new improvements to sites, as there are long-overdue things in the queue and procrastination prevents further work on further extensions.</p>
<p>I recently managed to split my writings across more sites. It helps keep the signal-to-noise ratio higher.</p>
<p>This year Rianne and I found a good rhythm and have managed to stay highly productive and focused.</p>
<p>For ManCity, sooner or later the negative press will fade away and people will talk about the football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/13/mancity-back-on-topic-football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reject Bots and Cheapening of Services</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/12/reject-bots-and-cheapening-of-services/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/12/reject-bots-and-cheapening-of-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=10199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aim high Last month: E.ON (E.ON Next) Tried to Force or Trick Me Into Talking to a Chatbot, Not Staff of E.ON he other day (or night rather) I phoned a support line; the thing to note is, some companies outsourced to call centres overseas, some hired on the cheap domestically, some experiment with voice [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Aim high</em></p>
<p><b>Last month</b>: <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/25/e-on-tried-to-force-or-trick-me-into-talking-to-a-chatbot-not-staff-of-e-on/">E.ON (E.ON Next) Tried to Force or Trick Me Into Talking to a Chatbot, Not Staff of E.ON</a></p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/t.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="T" />he other day (or <em>night</em> rather) I phoned a support line; the thing to note is, some companies outsourced to call centres overseas, some hired on the cheap domestically, some experiment with voice menus (that lead to the &#8220;right&#8221; person/department), and some try chatbots (which are offensive). If one tries hard enough, there&#8217;s a domestic team over the phone (upon escalation), but it is not available 24/7. If you can reach it, things will be resolved quickly and effectively.</p>
<p>If we value or strive for &#8220;full employment&#8221;, we&#8217;ll collectively do our best to reject the &#8220;cheapening&#8221; or support line and always demand local workers with ample knowledge of what they support.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t about nationalism, it&#8217;s about time savings for customers. Subpart support leads to time-wasting and frustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/12/reject-bots-and-cheapening-of-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Never Envy People Who Drive (or Who Still Have Cars)</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/02/i-never-envy-people-who-drive-or-who-still-have-cars/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/02/i-never-envy-people-who-drive-or-who-still-have-cars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 07:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less so over time he driver&#8217;s licence in my possession says 2026, so this isn&#8217;t sour grapes. I can still drive, but I&#8217;d need to rent or buy a car to do so. But would I? Last time I checked the process of renting a car (paperwork etc.) and costs, I was immediately amused. How [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Less so over time</em></p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/t.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="T" />he driver&#8217;s licence in my possession says 2026, so this isn&#8217;t sour grapes. I can still drive, but I&#8217;d need to rent or buy a car to do so.</p>
<p>But would I?</p>
<p>Last time  I checked the process of renting a car (paperwork etc.) and costs, I was immediately amused. How would that save any time? Even if driving somewhere could save time, why would I spend 3 hours dealing with forms, refilling the tank, returning the car?</p>
<p>Buying a car? Forget about it. Purchasing price aside, consider all the toil associated with monthly paperwork (insurance, MOT etc.) and maintenance, repair, clean-up and so on.</p>
<p>I simply fail to see how cars would save me time. They can enhance mobility, sure, but <em>at what cost</em>?</p>
<p>Phoning a taxi isn&#8217;t hard. In relative terms, they are not so expensive either.</p>
<p>The mental burden spared  by &#8220;renting a driver&#8221; (not a car)  is already invaluable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/10/02/i-never-envy-people-who-drive-or-who-still-have-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“We don&#8217;t make movies to make money&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/24/we-dont-make-movies-to-make-money/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/24/we-dont-make-movies-to-make-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 13:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have fun quite liked this new take on why to &#8220;Make More Websites&#8221; &#8211; it is sometimes obvious and something along the lines of &#8220;do what you like&#8230;&#8221; (it&#8217;s not about money). To quote someone who in turn quotes John Gruber: I was listening to the episode “Make Your Own Thing” from the Off Protocol [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Have fun</em></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> quite liked this <a href="https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2026/make-money-to-make-more-websites/">new take on why to &#8220;Make More Websites&#8221;</a> &#8211; it is sometimes obvious and something along the lines of &#8220;do what you like&#8230;&#8221; (it&#8217;s not about money). To quote someone who in turn quotes John Gruber:</p>
<blockquote><p>I was listening to <a href="https://atproto.com/off-protocol/2026-09-11-make-your-own-thing-john-gruber">the episode “Make Your Own Thing” from the <em>Off Protocol</em> podcast</a> where Jim Ray interviews John Gruber. </p>
<p>They cover a variety of topics, including Gruber’s thoughts on the dilution of personal brand by publishing through “chain” platforms like Substack (I quite enjoyed the metaphor of a personal website where you publish your stuff to that of a chef/restaurant, but that’s a separate post).</p>
<p>Around ~1:13:00, Gruber quotes Walt Disney who said, “We don&#8217;t make movies to make money, we make money to make more movies.” And he goes on to argue that when you’re forced to choose one of these priorities over the other — because you will undoubtedly face decisions where the two sets of values come into direct opposition — the company that prioritizes making movies <em>over</em> making money is fundamentally a different company than the one that chooses making money <em>over</em> making movies.</p>
<p>If you ultimately prioritize making money, then what’s going to be ultimately great about your company is you make a lot of money (for shareholders, for owners, for yourself, for whomever). </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I never did any site to make money. It&#8217;s <strong>never about money</strong>. <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2025/12/25/protecting-free-software/">Money is made to be disposed of</a>. It&#8217;s to be used for something one believes in, not to hoard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/24/we-dont-make-movies-to-make-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colgate Shrinkflation</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/22/colgate-shrinkflation/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/22/colgate-shrinkflation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 05:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less for more used to joke that sooner or later the 150ml tubes, which became 125ml tubes, will become 100ml as &#8216;standard&#8217;. In &#8220;COVID times&#8221; they shrank that to 75ml and finally, yesterday, I saw 50ml tubes. They make these seem bigger than they are. So we all pay more for packaging materials, not products. [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Less for more</em></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> used to joke that sooner or later the 150ml tubes, which became 125ml tubes, will become 100ml as &#8216;standard&#8217;. In &#8220;COVID times&#8221; they shrank that to 75ml and finally, yesterday, I saw 50ml tubes. They make these seem bigger than they are.</p>
<p>So we all pay more for packaging materials, not products.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not only Colgate; other companies do the same. It&#8217;s just that Colgate became &#8220;household name&#8221; (or brand).</p>
<p>In some markets they use <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/01/are-sachets-the-new-capsules/">sachets for toothpaste too</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/22/colgate-shrinkflation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Money is Not a Noble Goal</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/19/money-is-not-a-noble-goal/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/19/money-is-not-a-noble-goal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 07:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10cc &#8211; Art For Art’s Sake never truly pursued money (I still don&#8217;t). I didn&#8217;t see the point. Tennis, for instance, was more fun. Computer games were fun too. In my entire lifetime, or in my adult life as a student, I didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d pursue a &#8220;career path&#8221; (ludicrous term, conflating life path with [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=I9Xq2HmkMOA">10cc &#8211; Art For Art’s Sake</a></p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/art-sake.jpg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/art-sake.jpg" alt="10cc - Art For Art’s Sake" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9696" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> never <em>truly</em> pursued money (I still don&#8217;t). I didn&#8217;t see the point. Tennis, for instance, was more fun. Computer games were fun too.</p>
<p>In my entire lifetime, or in my adult life as a student, I didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d pursue a &#8220;career path&#8221; (ludicrous term, conflating life path with &#8220;career&#8221;) that nets me the most money I can possibly amass. It would be foolish to do so and it would not bring happiness, it might even accompany evil eyes, stress, and too high an expectation.</p>
<p>Yesterday in Geminispace I saw &#8220;<a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/wftsow">Work for the sake of work</a>&#8221; and today a friend sent me the HTML/HTTP version of the same. It makes some good points. When people do art they typically do it out of passion. As for money? Think about it. As 10cc put it, <em>&#8220;for God&#8217;s sake&#8230;&#8221;</em><sup>*</sup></p>
<p>Money can sometimes come if you do what you like. Sometimes it won&#8217;t come. And that&#8217;s OK. At least you do what you like and what might serve society best, with or without reward/compensation for it.</p>
<p>Sometimes the best paying jobs are jobs that actively harm society. True story!</p>
<p>The reason everyone is forced/pressured/shamed into work (as in salaried activity) is the assumption is that without this &#8220;social norm&#8221; people would be lazy and society would not improve. It would become &#8220;unproductive&#8221;.</p>
<p>Work that you go to (e.g. office, workplace) out of fear or pressure is a thing that leads to misery. But capitalism does not think in <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/15/maslows-hierarchy-of-needs/">terms like Maslow&#8217;s</a>. </p>
<p>_____</p>
<p><sup>*</sup> Lyrics:</p>
<pre>
Gimme your body
Gimme your mind
Open your heart
Pull down your blind
Gimme your love, gimme it all
Gimme in the kitchen, gimme in the hall
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Gimme the ready's
Gimme the cash
Gimme a bullet
Gimme a smash
Gimme a silver, gimme a gold
Make it a million for when I get old
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Money talks so listen to it
Money talks to me
Anyone can understand it
Money can't be beat, oh no
When you get down, down to the root
Don't give a damn don't give a hoot
Still gotta keep makin the loot
Chauffeur driven
Gotta make her quick as you can
Give her lovin' make you a man
Get her in the palm of your hand
Bread from Heaven
Gimme a country
Where I can be free
Don't need the unions
Burying me
Keep me in exile the rest of my days
Burn me in hell but as long as it pays
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
</pre>
<p><a href="https://genius.com/10cc-art-for-arts-sake-lyrics">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/19/money-is-not-a-noble-goal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impeachment Time</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/12/impeachment-time/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/12/impeachment-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a sh&#8211;show. &#8216;ve noticed something quaint about Whiskey Pete and the circus that mans the Pentagon and uses 9/11 (after 25 years) to double down on self harm and global disdain/hatred for the US. When or if Iran does real damage to US army assets, the US first tries to hide (cover up) or [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What a sh&#8211;show.</em></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />&#8216;ve noticed something quaint about Whiskey Pete and the circus that mans the Pentagon and uses 9/11 (after 25 years) to double down on <b>self harm</b> and global disdain/hatred for the US.</p>
<p>When or if Iran does real damage to US army assets, the US first tries to hide (cover up) or deny anything happened. Failing that, it belittles the impact, e.g. saying no casualties. Israel does the same thing.</p>
<p>If media with credibility and data shows decent evidence, US media will try to say it&#8217;s made in North Korea or imported from elsewhere (or attack the media for &#8220;helping Iran&#8221;).</p>
<p>If disproven, it&#8217;ll blame &#8220;Russia&#8221; for giving help (like location/information from satellites). Now it blames &#8220;China&#8221;.</p>
<p>Never blame the man who stated this war? Never blame a dumb war that clogged up oil and gas traffic, resulting in direct financial hurt to everyone on this planet?</p>
<p>If a president needs to commit some more crimes (like bribing voters) to distract from military and financial shambles, maybe it&#8217;s time to impeach him already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/12/impeachment-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
