<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>schestowitz.com &#187; Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/category/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog</link>
	<description>Reflections on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 15:19:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Money is Not a Noble Goal</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/19/money-is-not-a-noble-goal/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/19/money-is-not-a-noble-goal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 07:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10cc &#8211; Art For Art’s Sake never truly pursued money (I still don&#8217;t). I didn&#8217;t see the point. Tennis, for instance, was more fun. Computer games were fun too. In my entire lifetime, or in my adult life as a student, I didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d pursue a &#8220;career path&#8221; (ludicrous term, conflating life path with [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=I9Xq2HmkMOA">10cc &#8211; Art For Art’s Sake</a></p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/art-sake.jpg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/art-sake.jpg" alt="10cc - Art For Art’s Sake" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9696" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> never <em>truly</em> pursued money (I still don&#8217;t). I didn&#8217;t see the point. Tennis, for instance, was more fun. Computer games were fun too.</p>
<p>In my entire lifetime, or in my adult life as a student, I didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d pursue a &#8220;career path&#8221; (ludicrous term, conflating life path with &#8220;career&#8221;) that nets me the most money I can possibly amass. It would be foolish to do so and it would not bring happiness, it might even accompany evil eyes, stress, and too high an expectation.</p>
<p>Yesterday in Geminispace I saw &#8220;<a href="https://idiomdrottning.org/wftsow">Work for the sake of work</a>&#8221; and today a friend sent me the HTML/HTTP version of the same. It makes some good points. When people do art they typically do it out of passion. As for money? Think about it. As 10cc put it, <em>&#8220;for God&#8217;s sake&#8230;&#8221;</em><sup>*</sup></p>
<p>Money can sometimes come if you do what you like. Sometimes it won&#8217;t come. And that&#8217;s OK. At least you do what you like and what might serve society best, with or without reward/compensation for it.</p>
<p>Sometimes the best paying jobs are jobs that actively harm society. True story!</p>
<p>The reason everyone is forced/pressured/shamed into work (as in salaried activity) is the assumption is that without this &#8220;social norm&#8221; people would be lazy and society would not improve. It would become &#8220;unproductive&#8221;.</p>
<p>Work that you go to (e.g. office, workplace) out of fear or pressure is a thing that leads to misery. But capitalism does not think in <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/15/maslows-hierarchy-of-needs/">terms like Maslow&#8217;s</a>. </p>
<p>_____</p>
<p><sup>*</sup> Lyrics:</p>
<pre>
Gimme your body
Gimme your mind
Open your heart
Pull down your blind
Gimme your love, gimme it all
Gimme in the kitchen, gimme in the hall
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Gimme the ready's
Gimme the cash
Gimme a bullet
Gimme a smash
Gimme a silver, gimme a gold
Make it a million for when I get old
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Money talks so listen to it
Money talks to me
Anyone can understand it
Money can't be beat, oh no
When you get down, down to the root
Don't give a damn don't give a hoot
Still gotta keep makin the loot
Chauffeur driven
Gotta make her quick as you can
Give her lovin' make you a man
Get her in the palm of your hand
Bread from Heaven
Gimme a country
Where I can be free
Don't need the unions
Burying me
Keep me in exile the rest of my days
Burn me in hell but as long as it pays
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
Art for art's sake
Money for God's sake
</pre>
<p><a href="https://genius.com/10cc-art-for-arts-sake-lyrics">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/19/money-is-not-a-noble-goal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impeachment Time</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/12/impeachment-time/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/12/impeachment-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a sh&#8211;show. &#8216;ve noticed something quaint about Whiskey Pete and the circus that mans the Pentagon and uses 9/11 (after 25 years) to double down on self harm and global disdain/hatred for the US. When or if Iran does real damage to US army assets, the US first tries to hide (cover up) or [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What a sh&#8211;show.</em></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />&#8216;ve noticed something quaint about Whiskey Pete and the circus that mans the Pentagon and uses 9/11 (after 25 years) to double down on <b>self harm</b> and global disdain/hatred for the US.</p>
<p>When or if Iran does real damage to US army assets, the US first tries to hide (cover up) or deny anything happened. Failing that, it belittles the impact, e.g. saying no casualties. Israel does the same thing.</p>
<p>If media with credibility and data shows decent evidence, US media will try to say it&#8217;s made in North Korea or imported from elsewhere (or attack the media for &#8220;helping Iran&#8221;).</p>
<p>If disproven, it&#8217;ll blame &#8220;Russia&#8221; for giving help (like location/information from satellites). Now it blames &#8220;China&#8221;.</p>
<p>Never blame the man who stated this war? Never blame a dumb war that clogged up oil and gas traffic, resulting in direct financial hurt to everyone on this planet?</p>
<p>If a president needs to commit some more crimes (like bribing voters) to distract from military and financial shambles, maybe it&#8217;s time to impeach him already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/12/impeachment-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being Happy and Hoarding Not the Same Thing</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/07/being-happy-and-hoarding-not-the-same-thing/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/07/being-happy-and-hoarding-not-the-same-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 06:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The researchers were particularly interested in three psychological needs identified by self-determination theory: relatedness, or having meaningful relationships; competence, or feeling capable and effective; and autonomy, meaning that our actions feel voluntarily chosen rather than forced on us.&#8221; -&#8220;Not Money or Pleasure: Scientists Say They&#8217;ve Found The True Key to Happiness&#8221; (5 September 2026) n [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;The researchers were particularly interested in three psychological needs identified by self-determination theory: relatedness, or having meaningful relationships; competence, or feeling capable and effective; and autonomy, meaning that our actions feel voluntarily chosen rather than forced on us.&#8221;</em> -<a href="https://www.sciencealert.com/not-money-or-pleasure-scientists-say-theyve-found-the-true-key-to-happiness">&#8220;Not Money or Pleasure: Scientists Say They&#8217;ve Found The True Key to Happiness&#8221;</a> (5 September 2026)</p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /><br />
n capitalism, people are meant to conflate accumulation of capital (or material assets) with &#8220;success&#8221; and that sort of success is interchangeable with happiness. But this is a gross oversimplification as pursuit of capital is not in its own right joyful or pleasant. Many people derive pleasure from social things because they are, after all, &#8220;social animals&#8221;.</p>
<p>Those who seek improvement in their lives by working hard to gain more money may find that it&#8217;s easier for them to purchase more things or better things. But at what cost?</p>
<p>Also, more personal belongings can one day became liabilities or burdens. This is why many people, especially late in their lives, give things away and move into smaller, simpler places/spaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/07/being-happy-and-hoarding-not-the-same-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bianco Apache / White Apache (1987)</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/06/bianco-apache-white-apache-1987/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/06/bianco-apache-white-apache-1987/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 19:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard to find oday we had a lot of spare time, so we watched some movies, including White Apache (1987), which relates to others (Bianco Apache). It&#8217;s actually a gory (but censored, a lot of stuff blurred out of view) movie with a sad ending. Lola Forner (from Spain) and Sebastian Harrison (from Italy) star [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Hard to find</em></p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Sebastian-Harrison-as-Shining-Sky-in-White-Apache-1987-01.jpg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Sebastian-Harrison-as-Shining-Sky-in-White-Apache-1987-01.jpg" alt="Sebastian Harrison as Shining Sky in White Apache (1987) " width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9410" /></a></p>
<p><img title="T" src="/IMG/Caps/t.png" alt="T" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />oday we had a lot of spare time, so we watched some movies, including <a href="https://onceuponatimeinawestern.com/white-apache-1987/">White Apache (1987)</a>, which relates to others (<a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090652/">Bianco Apache</a>). It&#8217;s actually a gory (but censored, a lot of stuff blurred out of view) movie with a sad ending. <a href="https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0286499/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_2_nm_6_in_0_q_Lola%20Forner">Lola Forner</a> (from Spain) and <a href="https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0365870/?ref_=tt_ov_3_1">Sebastian Harrison</a> (from Italy) star in it and it seems like their career went downhill years if not decades later.</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t make it into <a href="https://www.imdb.com/list/ls056161415/">famous lists</a> and the movie is relatively obscure by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/06/bianco-apache-white-apache-1987/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dogs Bred to Become Weapons of War (or Cops)</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/03/dogs-bred-to-become-weapons-of-war-or-cops/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/03/dogs-bred-to-become-weapons-of-war-or-cops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 19:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be prepared rowing up with many dogs, I loved dogs. Don&#8217;t get more wrong, I&#8217;m a &#8220;dog(s) person&#8221;. Years ago we thought about getting a dog ourselves. We ended up delaying and we only bought things for a dog, except the dog. Delays delays&#8230; We have one neighbour with a Bully XL. I don&#8217;t like [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Be prepared</em></p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/dog-isolated-on-white-1379723787yAt.jpg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/dog-isolated-on-white-1379723787yAt.jpg" alt="Rottweiler dog laying down isolated on white background" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9321" /></a></p>
<p><img title="G" src="/IMG/Caps/g.png" alt="G" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />rowing up with many dogs, I loved dogs. Don&#8217;t get more wrong, I&#8217;m a &#8220;dog(s) person&#8221;. Years ago we thought about getting a dog ourselves. We ended up delaying and we only bought things for a dog, except the dog. Delays delays&#8230;</p>
<p>We have one neighbour with a Bully XL. I don&#8217;t like those dogs (the breed) because I don&#8217;t trust them. I&#8217;ll probably never trust <b>any</b> Bully XL, not just because of what I read in papers (they even murder their own elderly owners sometimes) but the actual <b>ban</b> on such dogs (and sometimes &#8220;culls&#8221; too). The UK identified them as unworthy of the risk.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had to mentally prepare for a scenario where this one Bully XL goes berserk and decides to attack me. I&#8217;ve decided that because this dog is short-legged and clearly overweight sprinting away from it would be effective enough; he cannot catch me and I can run for a lot longer before stamina becomes an issue. This Bully XL is around 60-70KG, it&#8217;s very short, and it&#8217;s just a &#8220;fat boy&#8221; basically. Second option is, hop on the roof of a nearby car. This &#8220;fat boy&#8221; cannot even jump over his home&#8217;s fence, surely a car would be &#8220;too tall&#8221; for him. Failing that, in case I need to wrestle such a dog, avoid neck bites or falling to the ground. Fatalities won&#8217;t be possible due to a bleeding leg or hand.</p>
<p>Of course they could just put a muzzle on this Bully XL. But guess what&#8230; of course they don&#8217;t and lecturing an old lady about it ain&#8217;t &#8220;my cuppa tea&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/03/dogs-bred-to-become-weapons-of-war-or-cops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outcomes Where Both Parties Lose</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/24/outcomes-where-both-parties-lose/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/24/outcomes-where-both-parties-lose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wrote something yesterday and it is something that seems to have attracted attention. My point was, sometimes the court says &#8220;you won&#8221;, but in reality it&#8217;s a bit like poker face (crossposted for emphasis with another title). Sometimes the judge knows upfront no money will be paid, as it simply cannot be paid, but then [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> wrote something yesterday and it is something that seems to have attracted attention. My point was, sometimes the court says &#8220;you won&#8221;, but <a href="http://news.tuxmachines.org/n/2026/08/23/Losing_a_Million_Pounds_Is_Not_Winning.shtml">in reality it&#8217;s a bit like poker face</a> (<a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/23/You_Can_Lose_Some_Battles_and_Still_Win_the_War.shtml">crossposted for emphasis</a> with another title). Sometimes the judge knows upfront no money will be paid, as it simply cannot be paid, but then follows the procedures to set the records right for the court, not for parties. That&#8217;s just how the system works.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an anecdote here. Someone cited <a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/23/Will_Your_Modern_New_Car_Still_be_on_the_Road_in_2060.shtml">my article (also from yesterday) that said <em>&#8220;life expectancy of a new car is now 7 years&#8221;</em></a>.</p>
<p>He said that &#8220;about 20 years ago, a dealer tried to cheat my dad out of a particular lifetime guarantee.  He, fortunately, had all the receipts even through they tried to prevent him from that by attempting to &#8220;forget&#8221; to give him the receipts several times, forcing him to stay and press the issue. However, having all the receipts, there was no way out for the dealer which even tried to buy the car from him, with increasing offers.  The  dealer eventually took the matter to court.  Technically they lost, and had to honor the lifetime guarantee.  But in reality it became a major victory for them because the court decided that the lifetime of a car is 7 years  from then on. Setting the definition of lifetime of a car at 7 years, established a throwaway culture for the vehicles and rewarded negligence by the dealers&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>So what sort of outcome is this? As an aside, regarding &#8220;modern&#8221; cars (that physically cannot long):  &#8220;Proprietary firmware and other forms of technological obsolescence will only worsen that.  Proprietary diagnostic APIs being among the worst.  Once the last of the independent mechanics are gone, watch out!&#8221;</p>
<p>The planet has processes, but not all human processes lead to all parties &#8211; if <b>any</b> &#8211; being happy. Sometimes only the lawyers win (fees, bills).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/24/outcomes-where-both-parties-lose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Premier League&#8217;s New Rules (by IFAB) Would Devastate Brett Wilson LLP</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/ifab-brett-wilson-llp/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/ifab-brett-wilson-llp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New rules against time-wasting, a tactic of Brett Wilson LLP (they doubled the duration of the recent hearing where we had an experienced legal team that included two barristers) can recall the hearing we had last month very well. How can I forget? Unlike the applicant, we attended it. He did not! He was in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>New rules <b>against time-wasting</b>, a tactic of Brett Wilson LLP (<a href="https://techrights.org/litigation.shtml">they doubled the duration of the recent hearing</a> where we had an experienced legal team that included two barristers)</em></p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/timewaste.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/timewaste.png" alt="The Premier League have today confirmed the new laws introduced by IFAB that will be part of the 2026/27 season." width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8940" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> can recall the hearing we had last month very well. How can I forget? Unlike the applicant, we attended it. He did not! He was in London at the time, but he chose to <u>not even show up</u>.</p>
<p>My barrister told me that his barrister was intentionally &#8220;time-wasting&#8221;. It was not hard to see this, he was very repetitive and clearly he tried to deny our side (<b>two</b> barristers) enough time to get across points. It was an exceptionally hot week, so those in the Court were already tired by the time our barristers had a say.</p>
<p>If &#8220;time-wasting&#8221; is a legal tactic (like stalling), then the Court needs to curtail it, even penalise for it.</p>
<p>Our barristers aren&#8217;t cheap and my barrister is vastly more experienced that the time waster&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Tomorrow I&#8217;ll write about these tactics in <em>Techrights</em>. The headline will be: &#8220;Decades of Debt, Weaponing Borrowed Money to Try to Put Critics in Debt&#8221;.</p>
<p><b>Prior parts below</b>:</p>
<table class="results">
<tr>
<td id="15153">2026-03-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/03/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_1_Out_of_200_Claim_No_KB_202.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 1 Out of 200: Claim No. KB-2024-001270 in a Nutshell</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15173">2026-03-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/04/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_2_Out_of_200_Detailed_Timeli.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 2 Out of 200: Detailed Timeline From 2012 (Attack on Reporters That Question Restricted Boot) to 2024 (Lawsuit Against Reporter and His Wife in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15196">2026-03-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/05/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_3_Out_of_200_A_More_In_Depth.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 3 Out of 200: A More In-Depth Breakdown</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15217">2026-03-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/06/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_4_Out_of_200_Rianne_s_Versio.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 4 Out of 200: Rianne’s Version of Events and Narrative</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15249">2026-03-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/07/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_5_Out_of_200_Clearly_Not_a_S.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 5 Out of 200: Clearly Not a Security Professional/Expert, Only Ever Pretending to be One</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15268">2026-03-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/08/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_6_Out_of_200_Intentionally_M.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 6 Out of 200: Intentionally Misnaming Women, People Who Offered to Testify That They Too Had Been Subjected to Similar Abuse</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15287">2026-03-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/09/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_7_Out_of_200_Like_With_the_S.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 7 Out of 200: Like With the Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Misuse of UK-GDPR to Try to Hide Embarrassing Facts</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15313">2026-03-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/10/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_8_Out_of_200_Gross_Misuse_of.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 8 Out of 200: Gross Misuse of UKGDPR to Protect the Agenda of American Back Doors (Mass Surveillance)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15339">2026-03-11</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/11/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_9_Out_of_200_5RB_Barrister_D.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 9 Out of 200: 5RB Barrister Does Not Even Know the Name of His Own Client (That He Was Paid Well Over $200,000 to &#8216;Speak&#8217; or &#8216;Cover&#8217; for)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15358">2026-03-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/12/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_10_Out_of_200_Showing_Public.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 10 Out of 200: Showing Public Tweets is Not a Privacy Violation, But This Isn&#8217;t About Justice, It&#8217;s About Censorship</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15394">2026-03-13</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/13/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_11_Out_of_200_Cannot_Censor_.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 11 Out of 200: Cannot Censor His Spouse, Accusations Are Repeated Today</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15408">2026-03-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/14/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_12_Out_of_200_Months_Ahead_o.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 12 Out of 200: Months Ahead of Serial Strangler From Microsoft Who Helped Double the Lawsuits (Funded by Third Parties) as &#8216;Revenge&#8217; for Exposing Crimes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15429">2026-03-15</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/15/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_13_Out_of_200_Abuse_of_Proce.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 13 Out of 200: Abuse of Process to Make False Accusations of UKGDPR Violations</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15448">2026-03-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/16/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_14_Out_of_200_The_Abusive_Ca.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 14 Out of 200: The Abusive Cases of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft and His Litigation Buddy Garrett Did Cause &#8220;Serious Harm&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15473">2026-03-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/17/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_14_Out_of_200_Men_Who_Strang.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 14 Out of 200: Men Who Strangle Women (and Worse) Trying to Force Us to Write Public Apologies to These Men</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15497">2026-03-18</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_15_Out_of_200_Background_and_Particulars_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 15 Out of 200: Background and Particulars of Truth Regarding Techrights and Tux Machines</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15519">2026-03-19</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_16_Out_of_200_Detailing_the_Actors_and_Ex.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 16 Out of 200: Detailing the Actors and Explaining Techrights&#8217; Own Internet Relay Chat (IRC) Network</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15543">2026-03-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_17_Out_of_200_A_Long_Track_Record_of_Onli.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 17 Out of 200: A Long Track Record of Online Abuse, Then Choosing a Low-Cost Law Firm to Muzzle People Who Have Illuminated This Abuse for Over a Decade</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15566">2026-03-21</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_18_Out_of_200_Third_Parties_Funding_Attac.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 18 Out of 200: Third Parties Funding Attacks on the Messengers, Lawsuits Against GAFAM-Critical Voices That Uphold Real National Security</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15579">2026-03-22</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_19_Out_of_200_They_Were_Ill_prepared_for_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 19 Out of 200: They Were Ill-prepared for Tough Questions in Cross-Examination</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15598">2026-03-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_20_Out_of_200_All_Roads_Lead_to_Rome_and_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 20 Out of 200: All Roads Lead to Rome and to GAFAM Funding</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15605">2026-03-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_21_Out_of_200_It_s_About_Behaviour_Online.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 21 Out of 200: It&#8217;s About Behaviour Online, Not How Much Money From Shadowy Third Parties Gets Spent on Lawyers and Two Barristers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15619">2026-03-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_22_Out_of_200_When_You_Complain_People_Im.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 22 Out of 200: When You Complain People Impersonate You in IRC (But You Yourself Impersonate People in IRC and Lock Them Out of Their IRC Handles)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15631">2026-03-25</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_23_Out_of_200_We_Were_Right_All_Along_for.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 23 Out of 200: We Were Right All Along (for 2 Years) About Third Party Funding and Willingness to &#8216;Break the Bank&#8217; in Pursuit of &#8220;Revenge&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15648">2026-03-26</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_24_Out_of_200_The_Failed_Effort_by_Brett_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 24 Out of 200: The Failed Effort by Brett Wilson LLP to Strike Out My Lawsuit and My Wife&#8217;s Lawsuit Against Garrett (the Master Allowed Our Lawsuits to Proceed)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15672">2026-03-27</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_25_Out_of_200_That_Time_Matthew_J_Garrett.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 25 Out of 200: That Time Matthew J. Garrett Got Temporarily Banned/Suspended From Twitter</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15689">2026-03-28</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_26_Out_of_200_Asking_for_Documents_and_In.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 26 Out of 200: Asking for Documents and Information You Already Have, Even Letters and E-mails That You Yourself Sent!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15707">2026-03-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_27_Out_of_200_Using_the_Tor_Network_to_Hi.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 27 Out of 200: Using the Tor Network to Hide From Consequences</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15728">2026-03-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_28_Out_of_200_Facing_Consequences_for_Imp.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 28 Out of 200: Facing Consequences for Impersonation and Worse</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15751">2026-03-31</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_29_Out_of_200_Violent_Language_Won_t_Go_A.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 29 Out of 200: Violent Language Won&#8217;t Go Away When You Use It in Your Site, Blog, and Social Control Media</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15776">2026-04-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_30_Out_of_200_The_Time_We_Reported_Abuse_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 30 Out of 200: The Time We Reported Abuse to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and It Was Escalated to Its Cybercrime Unit</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15790">2026-04-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_31_Out_of_200_Speaking_About_20_Years_of_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 31 Out of 200: Speaking About 20+ Years of Alleged Harassment/Defamation and High-Profile &#8216;Targets&#8217; of Garrett</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15808">2026-04-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_32_Out_of_200_Garrett_Made_Spurious_Reque.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 32 Out of 200: Garrett Made Spurious Requests (Later Withdrawn) the Same Week Someone He Later Spoke to by E-mail Sent Threats to Our Webhost</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15814">2026-04-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_33_Out_of_200_Garrett_Sued_by_My_Wife_and.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 33 Out of 200: Garrett Sued by My Wife and I, Then His Microsoft Acquaintance Files Another Lawsuit and Our Webhost Receives Legal Threats Too</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15830">2026-04-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_34_Out_of_200_The_Necessity_of_Transparen.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 34 Out of 200: The Necessity of Transparency, Illuminating Garrett&#8217;s and Graveley&#8217;s &#8216;Tag-Team&#8217; Act, Misusing the British Docket (From Far Away in America) in Efforts to Hide Bad Behaviour</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15843">2026-04-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_35_Out_of_200_How_to_Make_10_000_Pound_St.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 35 Out of 200: How to Make ~10,000 Pound Sterling (13,220.50 United States Dollars) by Copy-Pasting and Editing 10 Pages</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15865">2026-04-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_36_Out_of_200_Claim_KB_2024_003529_in_a_N.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 36 Out of 200: Claim KB-2024-003529 in a Nutshell (Microsoft Employee Does Terrible Things, Then Sues the Reporter in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15890">2026-04-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_37_Out_of_200_The_Correct_Suspicion_Garre.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 37 Out of 200: The Correct Suspicion Garrett and Graveley Were Collaborating in Overseas Litigation Against Critics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15903">2026-04-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_38_Out_of_200_Advertisement_or_10_000_Cla.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 38 Out of 200: Advertisement or £10,000+ Classified Ad in the Form of Court Filing in Another Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15916">2026-04-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_39_Out_of_200_Recycled_Text_for_Garrett_a.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 39 Out of 200: Recycled Text for Garrett and Graveley (Buy One, Get One Free?)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15922">2026-04-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_40_Out_of_200_Putting_Forth_Frivolous_Cla.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 40 Out of 200: Putting Forth Frivolous Claim Only a Few Days Before Running Out of Time (12 Months)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15942">2026-04-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_41_Out_of_200_More_Misuse_of_UK_GDPR_for_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 41 Out of 200: More Misuse of UK-GDPR (for US Citizens), More Copy-Pasting for Garrett and Graveley, Alleging That Publishing Unflattering Information is a &#8216;Privacy&#8217; Issue</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15948">2026-04-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_42_Out_of_200_Getting_the_Very_Basic_Tech.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 42 Out of 200: Getting the Very Basic Technical Concepts Very Wrong, or Where Miscomprehension Begets &#8220;Plausible Deniability&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15969">2026-04-11</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_43_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Partic.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 43 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims Almost Identical and 5RB Needs to Investigate Its Barristers (Its Reputation is at Stake)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15980">2026-04-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_44_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Copypa.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 44 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley &#8216;Copypasta&#8217; Sunday (Copy-Paste, Add One Word, Change &#8216;T&#8217; to &#8216;t&#8217;)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15993">2026-04-13</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_45_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Cases_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 45 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Cases Inherently the Same, Their Legal Team Can Barely Even Distinguish (Full Timeline)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16002">2026-04-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_46_Out_of_200_Alex_Graveley_s_Attorney_Ri.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 46 Out of 200: Alex Graveley&#8217;s Attorney Rick Cofer Did Not Deny That Graveley Had Strangled Women; He Did, However, Pay Local Officials</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16008">2026-04-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_47_Out_of_200_British_Courts_Are_Not_Cens.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 47 Out of 200: British Courts Are Not Censorship Offices for Americans Funded by Affluent Third Parties</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16028">2026-04-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_48_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_and_5RB_Co.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 48 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB Copy-Pasting Bogus Claims for Violent Americans (Microsoft) Who Tell Women to Kill Themselves</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16047">2026-04-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_49_Out_of_200_Two_Americans_One_Case_Recy.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 49 Out of 200: Two Americans, One Case, Recycled for Low Budget at Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB Barristers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16059">2026-04-18</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_50_Out_of_200_The_Time_Staff_of_Law_Firm_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 50 Out of 200: The Time Staff of Law Firm Burgess Mee Was Showing Up in Letters Sent for a Serial Strangler From Microsoft</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16073">2026-04-19</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_51_Out_of_200_On_Perjury_and_What_It_Mean.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 51 Out of 200: On Perjury and What It Means to Take Third-Party Funding to Attack Reporter and His Family (in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16081">2026-04-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_52_Out_of_200_Phil_Golding_Appointed_Bar_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 52 Out of 200: Phil Golding Appointed Bar Standards Board (BSB) Chief, Misogyny Must End</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16111">2026-04-21</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_53_Out_of_200_The_Lying_Solicitor_of_Alex.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 53 Out of 200: The Lying Solicitor of Alex Graveley Left Brett Wilson LLP Only Days or Few Weeks After the Garrett Trial (Attended by Almost Their Entire Office/Team)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16129">2026-04-22</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_54_Out_of_200_Alex_Matt_Automate_Twin_Cas.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 54 Out of 200: Alex-Matt/Automate Twin Cases, Separated at Birth, Drafted by Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16149">2026-04-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_55_Out_of_200_Strangled_Women_Charged_for.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 55 Out of 200: Strangled Women, Charged for Strangulation, Cannot Find a Job Now (After Microsoft)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16156">2026-04-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_56_Out_of_200_5RB_and_Brett_Wilson_LLP_s_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 56 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP&#8217;s Copy-Paste Machination for Garrett and Graveley</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16182">2026-04-25</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_57_Out_of_200_5RB_and_Brett_Wilson_LLP_Ma.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 57 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP Made the Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims a Lot Like Photocopies!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16196">2026-04-26</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_58_Out_of_200_5RB_and_Brett_Wilson_LLP_He.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 58 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP Helped Garrett and Graveley Make Equivalent of GAFAM NDAs Superficially &#8216;Enforceable&#8217; in the UK, Using Threats</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16204">2026-04-27</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_59_Out_of_200_Mentioning_the_Fact_Alex_Gr.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 59 Out of 200: Mentioning the Fact Alex Graveley Arrested and Charged for Strangulation in Texas is &#8220;Reckless&#8221; and &#8220;Malicious&#8221;, According to His &#8216;Hired Guns&#8217; in London</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16217">2026-04-28</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_60_Out_of_200_Talking_About_Corruption_at.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 60 Out of 200: Talking About Corruption at Microsoft and Arrest for Strangulation is &#8220;Malice&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16246">2026-04-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_61_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Must_U.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 61 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Must Understand That Reporting Women&#8217;s Issues in the United States of America (“the US”) is Not Impermissible</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16265">2026-04-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_62_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Issue_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 62 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Issue Astounding Copy-Paste Masterpiece Asserting Publicly-Accessible Embarrassing Facts Must Remain Hidden</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16275">2026-05-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_63_Out_of_200_Graveley_as_a_Stripped_Down.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 63 Out of 200: Graveley as a Stripped-Down Version of Garrett in the Particulars of Claim (5RB Barrister Could Do This in One Minute)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16299">2026-05-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_64_Out_of_200_Not_Amused_by_Repeated_Thre.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 64 Out of 200: Not Amused by Repeated Threats (to &#8220;Shut Down&#8221; My &#8220;Existence&#8221; While Mentioning My Wife Too)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16317">2026-05-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_65_Out_of_200_Graveley_and_Garrett_Claims.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 65 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims Are Word-by-Word Similar (They Also Collaborated All Along)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16324">2026-05-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_66_Out_of_200_Alex_Graveley_Did_Illegal_T.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 66 Out of 200: Alex Graveley Did Illegal Things, Then Asserted Mentioning Those Illegal Things is Privacy Violation</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16341">2026-05-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_67_Out_of_200_Graveley_and_Garrett_Claims.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 67 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims Against My Wife and I Assert &#8216;Distress&#8217;, But It Was Just a Copy-Pasted Template (Mechanical Crocodile Tears)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16372">2026-05-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_68_Out_of_200_Based_on_Their_Particulars_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 68 Out of 200: Based on Their Particulars of Claims, Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett Seem Like the Same Person (Exactly Same Words Used, Sloppily Recycled)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16386">2026-05-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_69_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_Strang.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 69 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley Strangles, Gets Arrested, Charged, Then Asks for Apology From Those Who Reported It by Recycling Garrett&#8217;s Plea for Apology</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16407">2026-05-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_70_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_Injunc.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 70 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley Injunction Request 100% the Same as Garrett&#8217;s (Pure &#8216;Copy-paste&#8217;, Not Even a Word or Single Character Changed!)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16420">2026-05-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_71_Out_of_200_5RB_Barristers_Made_Tens_of.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 71 Out of 200: 5RB Barristers Made Tens of Thousands of Pounds by Changing From Plural to Singular for Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16430">2026-05-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_72_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_and_Ga.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 72 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett Signed Documents That Hold Them Accountable to Truth and Liable for Lies</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16447">2026-05-11</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_73_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_and_Ga.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 73 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett Remain Closely Connected in May 2026 (&#8220;Tag-Teaming&#8221; Against Bloggers in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16461">2026-05-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_74_Out_of_200_The_Basis_of_My_Lawsuit_Aga.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 74 Out of 200: The Basis of My Lawsuit Against Alex Graveley, Who Helps Garrett Stack the Docket in Another Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16482">2026-05-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_75_Out_of_200_All_True_All_Verifiable_Unl.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 75 Out of 200: All True, All Verifiable, Unlike Garrett and Graveley Lying to at Least Three High Court Judges About What They Did</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16509">2026-05-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_76_Out_of_200_The_Problem_With_the_United.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 76 Out of 200: The Problem With the United Kingdom Allowing Americans to File Lawsuits by Proxy (Relayed by &#8220;Hired Guns&#8221;)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16520">2026-05-15</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_77_Out_of_200_They_Never_Knew_How_to_Hand.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 77 Out of 200: They Never Knew How to Handle Women (Except to Attack Them)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16544">2026-05-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_78_Out_of_200_Slandering_Me_for_Saying_th.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 78 Out of 200: Slandering Me for Saying the Truth About Graveley and Garrett&#8217;s Abuse of Processes, Stacking Dockets</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16553">2026-05-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_79_Out_of_200_They_Will_Soon_Reach_the_10.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 79 Out of 200: They Will Soon Reach the 100 KG (Kilograms) Milestone; Wheelbarrows, Not Justice (Quantity of Legal Papers Sent to Us)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16567">2026-05-18</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_80_Out_of_200_Having_Run_Out_of_Time_to_M.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 80 Out of 200: Having Run Out of Time to Meet a Judge&#8217;s Deadline, Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley Had Garrett&#8217;s Lawyers Argued My ~190-Page Defence and CounterClaim (DCC) Was Unclear About My Position</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16583">2026-05-19</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_81_Out_of_200_SLAPP_Censorship_Does_Not_W.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 81 Out of 200: SLAPP Censorship Does Not Work If Your Sole Strategy is Revenge (and You Attack the Family)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16596">2026-05-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_82_Out_of_200_British_Government_Interven.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 82 Out of 200: British Government Intervenes in the SLAPPs by Brett Wilson LLP</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16606">2026-05-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_83_Out_of_200_Religion_is_Still_Alive_But.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 83 Out of 200: Religion is Still Alive, But for Many This Religion is Monetary (Greed, Monopolies, Corporate Power)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16627">2026-05-22</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_84_Out_of_200_New_Legislation_Against_SLA.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 84 Out of 200: New Legislation Against SLAPPs on the Way (After We Reached Out to Ministers)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16637">2026-05-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_85_Out_of_200_The_United_Kingdom_s_Rating.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 85 Out of 200: The United Kingdom&#8217;s Rating for Press Freedom Has Improved, But We Can Do Even Better</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16653">2026-05-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_86_Out_of_200_The_Position_of_Courts_on_C.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 86 Out of 200: The Position of Courts on Computer-Generated Lawsuits and Filings From Another Continent (Made by Two Men Who Work for Slop Companies)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16668">2026-05-25</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_87_Out_of_200_Access_to_Justice.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 87 Out of 200: Access to Justice</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16680">2026-05-26</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_88_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_is_Defamin.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 88 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP is Defaming Trans People in America Because Garrett Pays Hired Guns to Silence Them</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16705">2026-05-27</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_89_Out_of_200_SRA_Admits_Malfunction_That.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 89 Out of 200: SRA Admits Malfunction, That&#8217;s Why Transparency is Paramount</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16713">2026-05-28</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_90_Out_of_200_When_Efforts_to_Silence_His.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 90 Out of 200: When Efforts to Silence His Spouse and Also the Wife of a Blogger in Another Continent Only Give More Exposure to Embarrassing Information</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16739">2026-05-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_91_Out_of_200_Legal_Aid_in_Support_of_Fre.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 91 Out of 200: Legal Aid in Support of Freedom of the Press and British Women (Attacked by Americans)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16756">2026-05-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_92_Out_of_200_A_Spouse_Cannot_be_Turned_O.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 92 Out of 200: A Spouse Cannot be Turned &#8220;On&#8221; and &#8220;Off&#8221; Like a Faucet</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16767">2026-05-31</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_93_Out_of_200_A_Blueprint_of_Reckless_Law.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 93 Out of 200: A Blueprint of Reckless Lawfare in the UK, Waged and Funded by Americans (in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16781">2026-06-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_94_Out_of_200_SLAPP_by_Garrett_s_Litigati.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 94 Out of 200: SLAPP by Garrett&#8217;s Litigation Buddy Started 20 Months Ago, He Has Not Even Put in His Defence Yet!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16796">2026-06-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_95_Out_of_200_The_Growing_Risk_of_Tolerat.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 95 Out of 200: The Growing Risk of Tolerating Men Who Abuse and Physically Assault Women</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16827">2026-06-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_96_Out_of_200_When_You_Receive_Death_Thre.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 96 Out of 200: When You Receive Death Threats From Anonymous Sockpuppets/Burner Accounts Connected to People Who Strangle Women and Tell Women to Kill Themselves</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16855">2026-06-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_97_Out_of_200_Garrett_in_Hiding_From_the_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 97 Out of 200: Garrett in Hiding (From the Simple Observable Fact He&#8217;s Closely Connected to the Microsofter Who Strangles Women, Tells Women to Kill Themselves, and Worse)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16874">2026-06-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_98_Out_of_200_Microsoft_Threatening_Real_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 98 Out of 200: Microsoft Threatening Real Security Researcher With Criminal Investigation for Talking About Microsoft&#8217;s Bug Doors/Back Doors</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16910">2026-06-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_99_Out_of_200_Graveley_and_Garrett_Seem_t.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 99 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Seem to Have Crashed Brett Wilson LLP (Worse Than Taking Russian Oligarchs as SLAPP Clients)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16928">2026-06-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_100_Out_of_200_Interlude_and_Outline_of_t.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 100 Out of 200: Interlude and Outline of the First Half, 3+ Months That Got Us Death Threats Connected to Brett Wilson LLP (and Cyber Attacks That Are Difficult to Attribute)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16946">2026-06-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_101_Out_of_200_Women_Come_to_Realise_They.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 101 Out of 200: Women Come to Realise They Don&#8217;t Wish to Participate in Attacking Vulnerable Women</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16963">2026-06-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_102_Out_of_200_Maybe_One_Day_Whistleblowe.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 102 Out of 200: Maybe One Day Whistleblowers From Brett Wilson LLP Will Tell Us What Really Happened</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16973">2026-06-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_103_Out_of_200_Telling_People_What_They_K.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 103 Out of 200: Telling People What They Know and Don&#8217;t Know About Death Threats They Receive</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17002">2026-06-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_104_Out_of_200_Exactly_Two_Years_Ago_Bret.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 104 Out of 200: Exactly Two Years Ago Brett Wilson LLP Humiliated or Weaponised Our Solicitor&#8217;s Judaism in an Effort to Censor and Gag Us</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17009">2026-06-13</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_105_Out_of_200_When_Bad_Legal_Advice_Resu.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 105 Out of 200: When Bad Legal Advice Results in Your Client, Dale Vince, Ordered to Pay £600k &#8211; or 801,930 United States Dollar (USD) &#8211; to the Person Frivolously Sued (Lord Bailey of Paddington)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17021">2026-06-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_106_Out_of_200_100_Kilograms_of_Legal_Pap.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 106 Out of 200: 100 Kilograms of Legal Papers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17031">2026-06-15</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_107_Out_of_200_Keeping_Law_Accessible_to_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 107 Out of 200: Keeping Law Accessible to Everybody</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17065">2026-06-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_108_Out_of_200_Moving_On_and_Moving_Up.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 108 Out of 200: Moving On and Moving Up</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17087">2026-06-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_109_Out_of_200_When_You_Drag_Family_Membe.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 109 Out of 200: When You Drag Family Members Into a Case Unrelated to Them Because Their Relative Published Something</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17096">2026-06-18</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_110_Out_of_200_Anti_SLAPP_Reform_Formally.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 110 Out of 200: Anti-SLAPP Reform Formally Advanced in the United Kingdom (UK) the Same Week the Serial Strangler From Microsoft (US) Does Forum-Shopping in the UK</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17119">2026-06-19</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_111_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_the_L.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 111 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley (the Latter Arrested for Strangling Women) Keep Ousting Their Collaboration in Litigation, Lawfare in a Foreign Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17134">2026-06-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_112_Out_of_200_Strangles_Women_Then_Refus.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 112 Out of 200: Strangles Women, Then Refuses to Even Attend Any of His Own Hearings About It</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17143">2026-06-21</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_113_Out_of_200_The_United_Kingdom_is_Not_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 113 Out of 200: The United Kingdom is Not Turkey</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17160">2026-06-22</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_114_Out_of_200_Thousands_Articles_to_Come.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 114 Out of 200: Thousands of Long Articles to Come, Properly Covering the SLAPP Industry in the UK and Its Modus Operandi</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17173">2026-06-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_115_Out_of_200_Spending_the_Next_Decade_W.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 115 Out of 200: Spending the Next Decade Writing About SLAPPs and Trying to Fix the System</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17182">2026-06-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_116_Out_of_200_5_Years_of_Multiparty_Lawf.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 116 Out of 200: 5 Years of Multiparty Lawfare Against Techrights, Funded by Americans and Also by Third Parties (Including Microsoft Salaries)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17198">2026-06-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_117_Out_of_200_Libel_Tourism_or_Defamatio.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 117 Out of 200: Libel Tourism or Defamation Forum-Shopping in the United Kingdom Condemned by the European Union (EU)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17213">2026-06-25</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_118_Out_of_200_Exposing_Crimes_is_Not_a_C.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 118 Out of 200: Exposing Crimes is Not a Crime, It is a Public Service</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17230">2026-06-26</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_119_Out_of_200_Our_Suggestions_to_Our_Pol.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 119 Out of 200: Our Suggestions to Our Politicians and Heads of State</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17277">2026-06-27</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_120_Out_of_200_Garrett_Undermines_His_Own.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 120 Out of 200: Garrett Undermines His Own Application Because His Friend Graveley Failed to Accomplish What They Had Both Aimed For</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17287">2026-06-28</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_121_Out_of_200_One_Day_We_ll_Discover_Wha.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 121 Out of 200: One Day We&#8217;ll Discover What Company or Rich Person/s Funded the Lawfare Against Us</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17322">2026-06-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_122_Out_of_200_Garrett_s_Solicitors_Confi.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 122 Out of 200: Garrett&#8217;s Solicitors Confirm That Garrett is Ban-Evading and Spying on Our IRC Network</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17337">2026-06-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_123_Out_of_200_Why_Violence_Against_Anima.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 123 Out of 200: Why Violence Against Animals Matters</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17369">2026-07-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_124_Out_of_200_The_Court_Deems_My_Wife_Co.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 124 Out of 200: The Court Deems My Wife Connected to the Case of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Invites Her to the Hearing Last Week</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17397">2026-07-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_125_Out_of_200_Litigants_in_Person_LIPs_H.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 125 Out of 200: Litigants in Person (LIPs) Handling American Lawfare Funded by Third Parties (About a Million Pounds for 100 Kilograms of Legal Papers)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17415">2026-07-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_126_Out_of_200_Becoming_More_Aggressive_A.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 126 Out of 200: Becoming More Aggressive Against Us Only Proves Us Right</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17445">2026-07-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_127_Out_of_200_Lawsuits_by_Americans_File.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 127 Out of 200: Lawsuits by Americans Filed in the UK a Burden on British Taxpayers, No Way to Recover the Funds When Americans Lose Their Cases</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17473">2026-07-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_128_Out_of_200_Making_Laws_Work_for_Brita.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 128 Out of 200: Making Laws Work for Britain, Not Oversensitive Americans Looking for &#8216;Revenge&#8217; by Lawfare</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17497">2026-07-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_129_Out_of_200_Iranian_Tactics.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 129 Out of 200: Iranian Tactics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17518">2026-07-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_130_Out_of_200_Jealousy_Envy_Hubris.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 130 Out of 200: Jealousy, Envy, Hubris</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17526">2026-07-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_131_Out_of_200_A_Big_Win_for_the_Media_in.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 131 Out of 200: A Big Win for the Media in the United Kingdom (UK) Today</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17531">2026-07-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_132_Out_of_200_When_You_Cannot_Pay_a_Mill.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 132 Out of 200: When You Cannot Pay a Million Pounds (1,335,520.00 United States Dollar) to Lawyers But Have a Strong Community</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17973">2026-07-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_133_Out_of_200_Lies_by_Omission.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 133 Out of 200: Lies by Omission</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18002">2026-07-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_134_Out_of_200_What_Majority_Rules_Tell_U.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 134 Out of 200: What &#8220;Majority Rules&#8221; Tell Us About the Litigant</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18024">2026-07-31</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_135_Out_of_200_Limited_Liability_Partners.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 135 Out of 200: Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) That Does Not Disclose Financial Activities Before August</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18033">2026-08-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_136_Out_of_200_Lawyers_That_Get_Paid_to_M.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 136 Out of 200: Lawyers That Get Paid to Mess About</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18057">2026-08-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_137_Out_of_200_Discovering_That_Spending_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 137 Out of 200: Discovering That Spending a Million British Pounds (1,348,250.01 United States Dollars) on Lawyers Cannot Take Down One&#8217;s Critics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18095">2026-08-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_138_Out_of_200_Garrett_Has_Basically_Lost.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 138 Out of 200: Garrett Has Basically &#8220;Lost&#8221; and It is &#8220;Embarrassing&#8221; to Them</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18118">2026-08-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_139_Out_of_200_Solicitors_Regulation_Auth.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 139 Out of 200: Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Needs More Public Scrutiny (New Management Changed Nothing, It&#8217;s Costing a Lot of Taxpayers&#8217; Money)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18150">2026-08-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_140_Out_of_200_You_Become_What_You_Eat_Yo.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 140 Out of 200: You Become What You Eat, Your Clients Become You</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18159">2026-08-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_141_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_Failed_to.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 141 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP Failed to Learn From the Mistakes of the European Patent Office (EPO)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18192">2026-08-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_142_Out_of_200_GemText_is_Not_a_Webpage_G.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 142 Out of 200: GemText is Not a Webpage, Gemini Protocol is Not the Web, and Capsules Are Not Websites</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18211">2026-08-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_143_Out_of_200_After_Nearly_10_Attempts_t.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 143 Out of 200: After Nearly 10 Attempts to Settle With Us and Over a Million Pounds Spent on Lawyers and Barristers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18227">2026-08-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_144_Out_of_200_The_Hired_Guns_Media_at_BW.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 144 Out of 200: The &#8220;Hired Guns&#8221; (&#8220;Media&#8221; at BW) Shrank Almost Three-Fold Since They Sued Us in 2024</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18238">2026-08-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_145_Out_of_200_They_Tried_Hard_to_Hide_th.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 145 Out of 200: They Tried Hard to Hide the Fact Their Client Had Been Sued, Twice Even</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18267">2026-08-11</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_146_Out_of_200_An_Industry_of_Plagiarism_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 146 Out of 200: An Industry of Plagiarism, &#8216;Normalised&#8217;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18287">2026-08-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_148_Out_of_200_The_SLAPP_Series_is_Slow_B.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 147 Out of 200: The SLAPP Series is &#8216;Slow&#8217; Because Timing Matters</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18317">2026-08-13</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_148_Out_of_200_The_Manosphere.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 148 Out of 200: The Manosphere</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18333">2026-08-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_149_Out_of_200_It_Took_a_Long_Time_to_Sho.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 149 Out of 200: It Took a Long Time to Show What Jason Arday (at Cambridge) and Harvey Weinstein (in Hollywood) Really Were</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18352">2026-08-15</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_150_Out_of_200_Always_Independently_Verif.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 150 Out of 200: Always Independently Verify What People Claim to Be (or Find Yourself in a Jason Arday-Type Moment/Dilemma)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18370">2026-08-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_151_Out_of_200_Dealing_With_Sleazy_People.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 151 Out of 200: Dealing With Sleazy People and Companies That Steal (While Employing These Sleazy People)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18385">2026-08-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_152_Out_of_200_Injunctions_Do_Not_Cover_C.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 152 Out of 200: Injunctions Do Not Cover Criticism, They Have Scope</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/ifab-brett-wilson-llp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Experienced Legal Professionals Say</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/11/what-experienced-legal-professionals-say/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/11/what-experienced-legal-professionals-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crossposted from Tux Machines arlier this month we went on holiday/vacation, which we are very much enjoying. Weeks earlier we published press releases [1, 2] about a hearing that ended 4 weeks ago. We were clear about what happened. Garrett told a bunch of nonsense in public. Maybe was was made to believe this nonsense, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/royal-courts.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/royal-courts.png" alt="What do you want to view from Royal Courts of Justice?" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8787" /></a></p>
<p><em><a href="http://news.tuxmachines.org/n/2026/08/11/Four_Weeks_After_the_Hearing_at_the_High_Court.shtml">Crossposted from Tux Machines</a></em></p>
<p><img title="E" src="/IMG/Caps/e.png" alt="E" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />arlier this month we went on holiday/vacation, which we are very much enjoying. Weeks earlier we published press releases [<a href="vhttps://techrights.org/litigation.shtml">1</a>, <a href="http://news.tuxmachines.org/litigation.shtml">2</a>] about a hearing that ended 4 weeks ago. We were clear about what happened.</p>
<p>Garrett <a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/29/Troll_Feeding_is_Time_Wasting.shtml">told a bunch of nonsense in public</a>. Maybe was was made to believe this nonsense, as he had not attended his <b>own</b> hearing. Why? Go figure&#8230;</p>
<p>Garrett&#8217;s lawyer and barrister only spent a few years in this occupation. It&#8217;s the same lawyer and barrister who <a href="https://techrights.org/n/2025/02/22/Microsoft_s_Serial_Strangler_and_Matthew_J_Garrett_Join_Forces_.shtml">work for his friend, Graveley</a>. They work on this <em>together</em>.</p>
<p>My lawyer and barrister have both spent <u>decades in this occupation</u> and are vastly more experienced, they know the two men above are &#8220;bullies&#8221; and have <a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_138_Out_of_200_Garrett_Has_Basically_Lost.shtml">&#8220;basically lost&#8221;&#8230; it&#8217;s &#8220;embarrassing to them&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p>Some dumb words in social control media won&#8217;t change this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/11/what-experienced-legal-professionals-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Purchasable Stuff Not the Same as Bliss</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/10/purchasable-stuff-not-the-same-as-bliss/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/10/purchasable-stuff-not-the-same-as-bliss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E are exactly two weeks away from Rianne&#8217;s birthday and gift ideas need to be based around sentimental value this year, not monetary value. Jewellery and other &#8216;vanity items&#8217; have always been a waste of money (hard work and sometimes child labour for a bunch of pebbles or metals or whatever). Over the course of [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/20180822_123949.jpg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/20180822_123949.jpg" alt="Gifting" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8766" /></a></p>
<p><img title="W" src="/IMG/Caps/w.png" alt="W" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />E are exactly two weeks away from Rianne&#8217;s birthday and gift ideas need to be based around sentimental value this year, not monetary value. Jewellery and other &#8216;vanity items&#8217; have always been a waste of money (hard work and sometimes child labour for a bunch of pebbles or metals or whatever). Over the course of three weeks a lot can be done to convert time into joy and joy lasts much longer in the mind than in the shop.</p>
<p>It takes courage and work to make gifts that aren&#8217;t just something one scans at the checkout (till) but instead produces one way or another.</p>
<p>The older I get, the more obvious it seems gifting in the &#8220;Traditional&#8221; (with capital T) sense became merely consumerism and we&#8217;re far detached from real scarcities, which aren&#8217;t something one can purchase. I was never fond of consumerism and birthdays; over time it becomes easier to explain the &#8220;whys&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/10/purchasable-stuff-not-the-same-as-bliss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People in Their Twenties Tend to Miss the Point</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/10/people-in-their-twenties-tend-to-miss-the-point/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/10/people-in-their-twenties-tend-to-miss-the-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slow down. T is the 10th of August today (day 3 of vacation) and we have 3 weeks left in this vacation, which is warming up. I am more relaxed than I&#8217;ve been in decades and so far I only do with I enjoy. We fed the birds at Mayfield today and tomorrow we plan [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Slow down</strong>.</p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/20180828_154134.jpg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/20180828_154134.jpg" alt="Oldham and Shaw tram" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8761" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />T is the 10<sup>th</sup> of August today (day 3 of vacation) and we have 3 weeks left in this vacation, which is warming up. I am more relaxed than I&#8217;ve been <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/09/best-summer-vacation-since-i-was-a-teenager/">in decades</a> and so far I only do with I enjoy. We fed the birds at <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/08/mayfield-birds/">Mayfield</a> today and tomorrow we plan to mostly relax. This afternoon/evening I pulled out one of the 1997 hits CDs; I still use optical drives a lot, the music from that era is on average a lot better than the contemporary stuff and there are no ads. With the drive working concurrently with the PC there is also less CPU toil (no signal decryption or decompression necessary).</p>
<p>Looking back at my 20s, I was &#8220;racing&#8221; a lot of the time and it seems rather common among people that age. What are they really racing towards? What is this &#8220;Rat Race&#8221;? Sooner or later they will realise that life is not a contest, social control media isn&#8217;t popularity (just shallow voyeurism/vanity), and health matters more than speed. About 2 years ago I began sleeping a lot more after 2 decades of trying to limit myself to 6 hours per night. Why? It was not healthy, that&#8217;s for sure. That had no point to it&#8230;</p>
<p>All around me I see anxious, nervous people &#8211; some to the point of being dependent on medication. Many of them have debt, obligations, and a lifestyle they cannot afford, which is connected to why they took loans in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/10/people-in-their-twenties-tend-to-miss-the-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
