On Wed, Sep 03 2014, Michael Stone wrote:
> Watched the video. He was invited to come to engage the debian
> community, and his style is well known. Debian could choose in future
> not to invite him (or anyone who might not speak in a way that
> everyone in the community likes) but I think it would be Debian who
> would be more harmed by operating in an echo chamber.
The point I disagree here is that speakers are not to be heald
to the standards and policies imposed on the speakers. Some animals
ought not to be more equal than others.
> This is not the same thing as enforcing a CoC on the mailing lists,
I am not sure I agree with this statement.
> and frankly I'm not convinced this would have been a clear violation
> even there.
Having said that, I re-watched the talk , and I was not
personally offended. I think, however, if the debconf delegates
determine that the CoC for speakers was violated, they should take
appropriate actions regardless of the magnificence of the speaker.
manoj
--
If reporters don't know that truth is plural, they ought to be
lawyers. Tom Wicker
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
4096R/C5779A1C E37E 5EC5 2A01 DA25 AD20 05B6 CF48 9438 C577 9A1C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
|
|
