On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 03:52:47 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [Rick] on Sunday 04 December 2005 03:42 \__
>
>> On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:11:14 -0800, John Bailo wrote:
>>
>>> Malware Magnet wrote:
>>>
>>>> "There can be no assurance software developers will continue to
>>>> develop software for Mac OS X, the Company's operating system, on a
>>>> timely basis or at all," the firm said.
>>>
>>> Translation:
>>>
>>> "Did you think we were still a computer company? No, we sell portable
>>> transistor radios..."
>>
>> ... really? what are they called?
>
> ByePod.
No such product.
>
> Apple might sooner or later lose avid users due to Linux.
It might. It might not. It might also peacefullt co-exist.
> Having enabled
> KDE translucency and shadow casting yesterday, I am convinced that the
> glitter of Mac OS X will not keep it alive for long.
Glitter is not what keeps Apple alive.
>
> Take a glimpse...
>
> http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=28612
>
> KDE: isn't she a beauty? Has anybody noticed the sheer amount of styles,
> themes and extentions on kde-look.org recently?
I've seen it. I use KDe on my desktop.
> That's the power of contribution from third parties or volunteers.
Yes? So?
--
Rick
|
|