On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 02:05:19 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:
>Duende wrote:
>
>> While sitting in a puddle CarolW. scribbled in the mud:
>>
>>>>Speaking of which. I just changed one of my sites to display random
>>>>articles on the home page. How do you think that will affect my SE
>>>>placement.
>>>
>>> One of my sites' main page changes periodically, about once a week,
>>
>> Mine changes every time you hit the refresh button. everything that is
>> except the <h1> and the menu. the page title is the same as the <h1>.
>> Google never has liked this site but MSN & Yahoo love it.
>
>I think the metatag which specifies 'visit-after' has (should have?) a
>significant effect too. That is unless Google et al. completely ignore it.
>I am not sure how much change in content affects (or should affect)
>crawling cycles... because it's too easy to fake.
>
>Roy
Everybody and their mother ignore that tag. why should an engine take
any notice of what *you* (or *me* or *anybody*) want? They work to
their own schedule. The way to get the spiders back frequently is to
change significant amounts of your content frequently. Define
significant. I can't, myself. Not even occasionally.
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk SEO@kruse.demon.co.uk
home of SEO that's shiny!
--
|
|
