Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Graffiti question/annoyance

  • Subject: Re: Graffiti question/annoyance
  • From: Mike Koenecke <mkoenecke@spamhole.com>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:17:18 -0500
  • Newsgroups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot
  • References: <3jf1noFp7398U1@individual.net> <1121080333.510555.121190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <h435d1tskcdfbkngpeq5fircuuktf347ha@4ax.com> <ol35d15m2rftj6uelbv542tq7udne7au0i@4ax.com> <db0bso$s9b$1@aken.eed.ericsson.se> <db0dpe$1gb$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk> <2ft7d1djh7ljf85nheudunnaj7074pd7jf@4ax.com>
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.sys.palmtops.pilot:303552
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:02:50 GMT, AaronJ <noemail@noemail.com> wrote:

>Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:
>
>>it's rather disappointing that Palm did not allow
>>the user an easy _choice_.   [G1 or G2] 
>
>Palm had no choice. A judge had ruled that Graffiti 1 infringed on a patent
>Xerox held on a handwriting recognition method called Unistrokes.

Actually, I recall that was overturned on appeal. The damage was done
by then, of course.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index