On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:24:55 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>__/ [ T.J. ] on Sunday 13 August 2006 10:13 \__
>
>> Try typing a few typos or miss-spellings in to google
>> ie.
>>
>> mobilr phones
>> mobile phonew
>> broadbanf
>>
>> and you can see what people are up to
>>
>> site:http://gecki.be
>> site:http://bafflec.be
>> site:http://enfinru.be
>>
>> Looks like they haven't put all their eggs in the same basket
>> this time and are keeping multiple sites small.
>
>Small? I only checked the first one. 64k pages is not small in my opinion,
>unless you compare that against that former 'disease' which contaminated the
>indices and cache with 5-10 billion pages/subsites...
>
>[sarcasm] Content spam will probably end when the namespace is depleted to
>the point where it is fully exhausted. iuwgduiwhsdf21.info, anyone? Such
>domain names have been comment-spamming the blogsphere recently.
>
>I guess that cheap registrars like GoDaddy, as well as those who just pick
>the bucks regardless of a site's vocation, are a detrimental factor. There
>ought to be some rules,
Where there are rules there must be both reward and penalties. These
tend to cost money. Who would pay in a rules scenario?
BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/marilyn-monroe-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis-orbis/amici-della-luna-glass.html
|
|
